From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: backport requests for 4.x-testing Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:11:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20120329151121.GG12008@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20120324172757.GA29504@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Teck Choon Giam Cc: Andrew Cooper , Keir Fraser , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:32:36PM +0800, Teck Choon Giam wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Keir Fraser wrote: > > On 24/03/2012 18:27, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" w= rote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 11:04:13AM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >>> On 06/03/12 10:13, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>> For a (hopefully soon) upcoming 4.1.3 and 4.0.4, may I ask to consid= er > >>>> the following changesets from -unstable for backporting: > >> > >> And also these: > >> 24140 tools: xend: tolerate empty state/*.xml > >> 23412 libxc: xc_domain_set_memory_map, xc_get_machine_memory_map (x86,= amd64 > >> only) > >> 23632 libxc: Squash xc_e820.h (and delete) into xenctrl.h > >> 23225 x86: make the pv-only e820 array be dynamic. > >> 23426 libxl: Add support for passing in the host's E820 for PCI passth= rough > >> 23428 libxl: Add 'e820_host' option to config file. > >> 23427 libxl: Convert E820_UNUSABLE and E820_RAM to E820_UNUSABLE as > >> appropriate. > >> 24013 x86,hvm: enable VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info op in hvm hypercall > > > > Applied 23225 and 24013. The other, toolstack-related, patches I will l= eave > > for a tools maintainer to ack or apply. > = Hey Teck, Thanks for reporting! > With the two backport patches committed in xen-4.1-testing (changeset > 23271:13741fd6253b), xl list or xl create domU will cause 100% CPU and xl list? > stuck for couple minutes with high load average and lastly crash the > server. Please consider to revert these two commits as I am not sure > which one is responsible for such crash. Hm, let me try seeing which one is the culprit. I think it is = 23225 as it is suppose to go along the other tool one, but lets double chec= k. > # top -c > = > top - 19:30:54 up 6 min, 4 users, load average: 9.16, 4.34, 1.76 > Tasks: 134 total, 4 running, 130 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 0.1%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.8%id, 0.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0= .6%st > Mem: 355216k total, 179132k used, 176084k free, 14580k buffers > Swap: 2120568k total, 0k used, 2120568k free, 43896k cached > = > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 2856 root 20 0 31832 1416 1008 R 99.0 0.4 5:52.98 xl create > /etc/xen/example-hvm-domU.cfg > 1 root 20 0 19368 1512 1220 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.35 > /sbin/init > = > = > Thanks. > = > Kindest regards, > Giam Teck Choon > = > = > > > > =A0-- Keir > > > >> which I've back-ported to 4.1 (please see attachments) > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel