From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per package v2 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:46:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20120330114633.GA16502@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1328545032-21373-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1328545032-21373-5-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <4F758569.9080608@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:55939 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751267Ab2C3Lqk (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:46:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F758569.9080608@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:05:29AM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > Andi, > Can you re-base this on top of my release tree? > > Your fix is important, but conflicted with mjg's > more invasive percentage -> frequency change. Sorry, I think it's probably better not to take my patch here - the spec uses percentages rather than frequencies. I'm not convinced that that makes sense, but there's some chance that some behaviour may end up depending on that. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org