All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: "Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz" <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: reset mount options after the last procfs umount
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:46:25 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120331154625.GA6241@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203311731.42388.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 17:31 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> On Saturday 31 of March 2012, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 16:19 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > > "after all procs are umounted". For me such way is fine but still can
> > > suprise people.
> > > 
> > > Anyway - what's the problem with implementing support for separate
> > > options for each mount point?
> > 
> > Well, IMHO multiple procs in one pid namespace is a very strange system
> > configuration.  I didn't see such installations. 
> 
> I have one real world case - linux-vserver.org guests where pid namespace is 
> optional and usually not used.

I'm a vserver noob.  Does it allow using multiple containers sharing the same
pid namespace?  Having only a single init process?

Thanks,

-- 
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-31 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-22  8:03 3.3 and hidepid feature problem - options not always applied at mount Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2012-03-23 17:10 ` [PATCH] proc: fix mount -t proc -o AAA Vasiliy Kulikov
2012-03-23 18:45   ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2012-03-23 19:18     ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2012-03-23 23:15   ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-25  7:24     ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2012-03-25 15:36       ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2012-03-25 17:40         ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2012-03-25 17:49           ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2012-03-25 22:23         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2012-03-26 22:37           ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-31 13:55             ` [PATCH] proc: reset mount options after the last procfs umount Vasiliy Kulikov
2012-03-31 14:19               ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2012-03-31 15:20                 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2012-03-31 15:31                   ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2012-03-31 15:46                     ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2012-03-26 22:35       ` [PATCH] proc: fix mount -t proc -o AAA Andrew Morton
2012-03-25 15:27     ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2012-03-31 13:51     ` Vasiliy Kulikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120331154625.GA6241@albatros \
    --to=segoon@openwall.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=a.miskiewicz@gmail.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.