On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 08:26:10AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 4/1/2012 4:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt | 3 +++ > > drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/clk.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > But why is this part of clkdev.c? devm_clk_get() should work regardless > of the implementation of clk_get() so can we put it into some other file > that is compiled if HAVE_CLK=y so everyone benefits from this and not > just users who select CLKDEV_LOOKUP? Mostly just because clk_get() is part of clkdev.c and I didn't feel like creating a new file, though also because I really hope that we're going to be moving away from open coding clock framework things so that we can start to push clock API usage into non-SoC code. Things like adding new clocks are going to be a part of that. To put it another way, why would a platform want to avoid clkdev? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: