From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:21:59 +0000
Message-ID: <201204011921.59596.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <20120401125741.GA7484@p183.telecom.by>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, drepper@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120401125741.GA7484@p183.telecom.by>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Sunday 01 April 2012, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>  arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl |    1 +
>  arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl |    1 +
>  fs/Makefile                      |    1 +
>  fs/nextfd.c                      |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/syscalls.h         |    1 +
>  5 files changed, 31 insertions(+)

I don't have any comments on the syscall itself, but when you add one, please
also make the change to include/asm-generic/unistd.h so it appears in the
various architectures using the generic syscall table.

	Arnd