From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Dobriyan Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 00:35:25 +0300 Message-ID: <20120401213525.GD4408@p183.telecom.by> References: <20120401125741.GA7484@p183.telecom.by> <201204011921.59596.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, drepper@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201204011921.59596.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 07:21:59PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sunday 01 April 2012, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 + > > arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 + > > fs/Makefile | 1 + > > fs/nextfd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/syscalls.h | 1 + > > 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+) > > I don't have any comments on the syscall itself, but when you add one, please > also make the change to include/asm-generic/unistd.h so it appears in the > various architectures using the generic syscall table. I will. The amount of places to plug new syscall is suprising. :-(