From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:34:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20120402113413.GA7560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1333306720-28344-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120402101427.GA3172@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120402104357.GB24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24" Cc: Linus Walleij , Rabin Vincent , Grant Likely , Samuel Ortiz , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120402104357.GB24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:43:57AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:14:28AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > I was waiting for some pronouncement from Russell - looking at the git > > logs it seems the patch tracker is the normal way to merge things. > Well, this stuff was invented by Linus, so its Linus' decision about > how to deal with the power control. Linus already acked the patch, the question was more about how to get it merged. Since most of the AMBA changes seem to go via your tree I've just submitted it to the patch system as 7366/1. --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPeY57AAoJEBus8iNuMP3dGg8P/Rg4W9/NSJqDzVr/fHBrhbIt B1ltzE0sWDzSCEV9IfKM68m263gOPZM+ZdnA3M+Il2bWTDsU/J20Tw/WZd1v+Rmx XjClRF7PWE7HIyxdUFNIlhfR5AXjdHlFViBbtzjl2G03JeJEQCt0HlMmXrBI+myG fG0UwWTnzsajaHltIqLmCcrNPAGvbqCqdJT1Xejam6vaYnC3+T2CCkxVQ6YI5mnB mhhCuP44dEtMcAm5Nvk63o3Z98EbjvyAETWgNpxiSr0WWRCeJh6tjQ6l7zMYRLXu Rb9AZIRgR/ZajZ1c1/Jwv5o6C13kb32prluMpGv3Vc5JzA25dpM2lDYCVfU57pny 4B9NWrZy1VdArE0lR8Xa2KE7QmXQtnIhuXla7BOQ0of3GXZA4n3FsH9ljLBTXr7o 9cOxGE8DYkKXKmSIqvfi8UrjuFT/u7j/ZuKzj9UZiH8Oqmi9VzSiqYzWSRk4TzjV kcXKKZXWPouozuBlCd88HYU75w3a2QsKuWPyLrxoAAP5fW1wAKPIQujPatdXT9D3 itbxt2mIe4qg0XcDmfn7p2SDDkjFwbrwy/ocWtdfAHDMFizCDMoyMIW0hf4MehlE NiJvk9vzgDyI8Fc3/valOyWOxuSuyICAhjP/zHwQEcLHggnKzxPDWiOEsY5J9/o1 2sUiAZ3jh3ykINwUq8Hr =zNu1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:34:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support In-Reply-To: <20120402104357.GB24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1333306720-28344-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120402101427.GA3172@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120402104357.GB24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20120402113413.GA7560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:43:57AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:14:28AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > I was waiting for some pronouncement from Russell - looking at the git > > logs it seems the patch tracker is the normal way to merge things. > Well, this stuff was invented by Linus, so its Linus' decision about > how to deal with the power control. Linus already acked the patch, the question was more about how to get it merged. Since most of the AMBA changes seem to go via your tree I've just submitted it to the patch system as 7366/1. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: