Re: build meta-oe without systemd

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:59:38AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Op 04-04-12 00:17, Eric B??nard schreef:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> would that make sense to support systemd as a DISTRO_FEATURES ? That
> >> would make builds using older udev (< 174) possible with meta-oe as this
> >> actually fails because of systemd.
> >
> > We talked about this during the yocto bsp summit this week and I'm working
> > on a patchset to send as RFC later this month (post 1.2 release):
> >
> > commit b98d45b1bc2d9cf9ba41629240e6c21f19ddceff
> > Author: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> > Date:   Tue Apr 3 14:13:59 2012 -0700
> >
> >    meta-systemd: move over systemd from meta-oe
> >
> >    Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> >
> > commit 59c57bd73d1f157dfada233df889852fdb4a692f
> > Author: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> > Date:   Tue Apr 3 14:12:42 2012 -0700
> >
> >    meta-systemd: create layer
> >
> >    Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> 
> 
> Woot! We can stop using BBMASK to exclude bbappends from meta-oe when
> this happens :)

Chris,

You should have been at the BSP Summit, especially as it was hosted at 
Mentor. :) That was one of the important decisions made, but this topic 
in particular was being discussed for a while... So, I second your Woot! :)

-- 
Denys