Re: [RFC] net/hsr: Add support for IEC 62439-3 High-availability Seamless Redundancy

[Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>]

On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 18:06:31 +0100
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 17:51 +0200, Arvid Brodin wrote:
> > David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:55:59 -0700
> > > 
> > >> That isn't so bad, doing a memcpy versus a structure copy.
> > > 
> > > GCC is going to inline the memcpy and thus we'll still do the
> > > unaligned accesses.  This change therefore won't fix the problem.
> > 
> > Well, it does work for me, with gcc-4.2.2-compiled linux-2.6.37 running
> > on an AVR32 board.
> > 
> > Just out of curiosity, what's the mechanism behind this inline
> > assignment that turns the memcpy into an unaligned access? If gcc is 
> > "smart" enough to detect a bunch of char * accesses and turn them 
> > into unaligned 32-bit accesses, isn't that a bug in gcc?
> 
> If I remember correctly, casting a char* pointer to foo* where the
> original pointer isn't properly aligned for type foo results in
> undefined behaviour.  And that is what icmp_hdr() is doing, so there is
> no requirement that the compiler does anything reasonable with the
> result.  Removing that cast (using skb_transport_header() instead of
> icmp_hdr()) should avoid that.
> 
> (We do generally assume, however, that if the processor can handle
> unaligned accesses in a useful way then the compiler will be reasonable
> and not break them.)
> 
> Ben.
>  
> > Or will this only happen on archs which __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCPY? (But looking
> > at a couple of arch/xxx/lib/string.c, these too seem to take alignment
> > into account.)
> > 
> 

Since icmp_hdr is 64 bits you might be able to use get_unaligned64
in some way.