On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 07:25:12PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 15:49:17 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:

> > Yeah, I couldn't understand why the non-managed functions were written
> > in this way so I followed the same pattern when I added the managed one
> > assuming that the original code was sane.

> Actually, I looked at it again, and the _one version behaves subtly
> different from the non-_one version.  That may be irrelevant though.

It always does a direction set, yes.  This will make a difference if the
direction call either fails or blocks future reconfigurations, what was
puzzling me was if this was an issue or not and like I say I decided to
assume it was and stick with the same pattern.