All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: vmscan: fix misused nr_reclaimed in shrink_mem_cgroup_zone()"
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:50:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120409125055.c6f6fdf0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334000524-23972-1-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com>

On Mon,  9 Apr 2012 12:42:04 -0700
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> wrote:

> This reverts commit c38446cc65e1f2b3eb8630c53943b94c4f65f670.
> 
> Before the commit, the code makes senses to me but not after the commit. The
> "nr_reclaimed" is the number of pages reclaimed by scanning through the memcg's
> lru lists. The "nr_to_reclaim" is the target value for the whole function. For
> example, we like to early break the reclaim if reclaimed 32 pages under direct
> reclaim (not DEF_PRIORITY).
> 
> After the reverted commit, the target "nr_to_reclaim" is decremented each time
> by "nr_reclaimed" but we still use it to compare the "nr_reclaimed". It just
> doesn't make sense to me...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c |    7 +------
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 33c332b..1a51868 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2107,12 +2107,7 @@ restart:
>  		 * with multiple processes reclaiming pages, the total
>  		 * freeing target can get unreasonably large.
>  		 */
> -		if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim)
> -			nr_to_reclaim = 0;
> -		else
> -			nr_to_reclaim -= nr_reclaimed;
> -
> -		if (!nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
> +		if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
>  			break;
>  	}
>  	blk_finish_plug(&plug);

This code is all within a loop: the "goto restart" thing.  We reset
nr_reclaimed to zero each time around that loop.  nr_to_reclaim is (or
rather, was) constant throughout the entire function.

Comparing nr_reclaimed (whcih is reset each time around the loop) to
nr_to_reclaim made no sense.

I think the code as it stands is ugly.  It would be better to make
nr_to_reclaim a const and to add another local total_reclaimed, and
compare that with nr_to_reclaim.  Or just stop resetting nr_reclaimed
each time around the loop.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-09 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-09 19:42 [PATCH] Revert "mm: vmscan: fix misused nr_reclaimed in shrink_mem_cgroup_zone()" Ying Han
2012-04-09 19:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-04-09 21:23   ` Ying Han
2012-04-09 22:29     ` Ying Han
2012-04-09 23:24   ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-10  0:04     ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-10 15:00 ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-10 15:16   ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-10 15:16     ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-10 16:44   ` Ying Han
2012-04-11 11:55     ` Hillf Danton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120409125055.c6f6fdf0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.