From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: dzickus@redhat.com, oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp,
kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: makedumpfile memory usage grows with system memory size
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:00:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120409190010.GI1645@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120406.101212.193682065.d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:12:12AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
[..]
> So now we can walk on the memmap array also for free pages like other
> kinds of memory. The question I have now is why the current
> implementation was chosen. Is there any difference between two ways?
I don't know but I am guessing may be going through buddy allocator
data structures is faster when there is tons of memory in the system and
number of free pages is less.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-09 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-28 21:22 makedumpfile memory usage grows with system memory size Don Zickus
2012-03-29 8:09 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2012-03-29 12:56 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-03-29 13:25 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-30 0:51 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-02 7:46 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-04-05 6:52 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-05 14:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-06 1:12 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-06 8:59 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-04-06 9:29 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-09 18:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-09 23:58 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-10 12:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-12 3:40 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-04-12 7:47 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
[not found] ` <20120427164649.9932a33f.kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp>
2012-04-27 12:52 ` Don Zickus
2012-05-11 1:19 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-05-11 13:26 ` Don Zickus
2012-05-15 5:57 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-05-15 12:35 ` Don Zickus
2012-04-27 13:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-05-14 5:44 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-05-16 8:02 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-05-17 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-09 19:00 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-03-29 13:05 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-30 9:43 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-03-30 13:19 ` Don Zickus
2012-04-02 17:15 ` Michael Holzheu
2012-04-06 8:09 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-04-11 8:04 ` Michael Holzheu
2012-04-12 8:49 ` Atsushi Kumagai
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-02 6:53 tachibana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120409190010.GI1645@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.