From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Moyer Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] block: Change default IO scheduler to deadline except SATA
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:37:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120410133708.GE21801@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am wondering if CFQ as default scheduler is still the right choice. CFQ
generally works well on slow rotational media (SATA?). But often
underperforms on faster storage (storage arrays, PCIE SSDs, virtualized
disk in linux guests etc). People often put logic in user space to tune their
systems and change IO scheduler to deadline to get better performance on
faster storage.
Though there is not one good answer for all kind of storage and for all
kind of workloads, I am wondering if we can provide a better default and
that is change default IO scheduler to "deadline" except SATA.
One can argue that some SAS disks can be slow too and benefit from CFQ. Yes,
but default IO scheduler choice is not perfect anyway. It just tries to
cater to a wide variety of use cases out of the box.
So I am throwing this patch out see if it flies. Personally, I think it
might turn out to be a more reasonable default.
Thanks
Vivek
Change default IO scheduler to deadline except SATA disks.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
block/Kconfig.iosched | 2 +-
block/elevator.c | 2 +-
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 4 ++++
include/linux/elevator.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/block/Kconfig.iosched
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/block/Kconfig.iosched 2012-04-09 22:18:30.941885325 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/block/Kconfig.iosched 2012-04-09 22:18:51.982885971 -0400
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ config CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
choice
prompt "Default I/O scheduler"
- default DEFAULT_CFQ
+ default DEFAULT_DEADLINE
help
Select the I/O scheduler which will be used by default for all
block devices.
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c 2012-04-09 22:18:30.946885325 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c 2012-04-10 01:09:10.529292695 -0400
@@ -1146,6 +1146,10 @@ static int ata_scsi_dev_config(struct sc
blk_queue_flush_queueable(q, false);
+ /* Change IO scheduler to CFQ */
+ if (!(*chosen_elevator))
+ elevator_change(q, "cfq");
+
dev->sdev = sdev;
return 0;
}
Index: linux-2.6/block/elevator.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/block/elevator.c 2012-04-09 22:18:30.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/block/elevator.c 2012-04-10 20:11:10.296866631 -0400
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int elevator_init_queue(struct re
return -ENOMEM;
}
-static char chosen_elevator[ELV_NAME_MAX];
+char chosen_elevator[ELV_NAME_MAX];
static int __init elevator_setup(char *str)
{
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/elevator.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/elevator.h 2012-03-13 01:07:29.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/elevator.h 2012-04-10 01:07:44.303289797 -0400
@@ -204,5 +204,7 @@ enum {
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(rq)->csd.list); \
} while (0)
+extern char chosen_elevator[];
+
#endif /* CONFIG_BLOCK */
#endif
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-10 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 13:37 Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-04-10 13:56 ` [RFC PATCH] block: Change default IO scheduler to deadline except SATA Jens Axboe
2012-04-10 14:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-10 15:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-10 16:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-04-10 17:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-10 17:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-04-10 18:36 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-11 16:25 ` Martin K. Petersen
2012-04-10 18:41 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-10 18:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-10 18:56 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-10 19:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-10 19:19 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-10 19:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-04-10 19:55 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-10 20:12 ` Mike Snitzer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-10 17:44 Xose Vazquez Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120410133708.GE21801@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.