From: jbrassow@sourceware.org <jbrassow@sourceware.org>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: LVM2 ./WHATS_NEW lib/metadata/raid_manip.c
Date: 11 Apr 2012 01:23:30 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120411012330.22012.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
CVSROOT: /cvs/lvm2
Module name: LVM2
Changes by: jbrassow at sourceware.org 2012-04-11 01:23:29
Modified files:
. : WHATS_NEW
lib/metadata : raid_manip.c
Log message:
RAID LVs could not handle a down-convert if a device other than the last one
in the array was specified for removal. This change addresses that (bz806111).
Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/WHATS_NEW.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.2376&r2=1.2377
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/lib/metadata/raid_manip.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
--- LVM2/WHATS_NEW 2012/04/10 23:34:41 1.2376
+++ LVM2/WHATS_NEW 2012/04/11 01:23:29 1.2377
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
Version 2.02.96 -
================================
+ Fix problems when specifying PVs during RAID down-converts.
Fix ability to handle failures in mirrored log (regression intro 2.02.89).
Fix unlocking volume group in vgreduce in error path.
Exit immediately if LISTEN_PID env var incorrect during systemd handover.
--- LVM2/lib/metadata/raid_manip.c 2012/03/15 20:00:54 1.25
+++ LVM2/lib/metadata/raid_manip.c 2012/04/11 01:23:29 1.26
@@ -975,6 +975,8 @@
static int _raid_remove_images(struct logical_volume *lv,
uint32_t new_count, struct dm_list *pvs)
{
+ uint32_t s;
+ struct lv_segment *seg;
struct dm_list removal_list;
struct lv_list *lvl;
@@ -1024,9 +1026,21 @@
}
/*
- * Resume original LV
- * This also resumes all other sub-LVs
+ * Resume the remaining LVs
+ * We must start by resuming the sub-LVs first (which would
+ * otherwise be handled automatically) because the shifting
+ * of positions could otherwise cause name collisions. For
+ * example, if position 0 of a 3-way array is removed, position
+ * 1 and 2 must be shifted and renamed 0 and 1. If position 2
+ * tries to rename first, it will collide with the existing
+ * position 1.
*/
+ seg = first_seg(lv);
+ for (s = 0; (new_count > 1) && (s < seg->area_count); s++) {
+ if (!resume_lv(lv->vg->cmd, seg_lv(seg, s)) ||
+ !resume_lv(lv->vg->cmd, seg_metalv(seg, s)))
+ return_0;
+ }
if (!resume_lv(lv->vg->cmd, lv)) {
log_error("Failed to resume %s/%s after committing changes",
lv->vg->name, lv->name);
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 1:23 jbrassow [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-24 20:05 LVM2 ./WHATS_NEW lib/metadata/raid_manip.c jbrassow
2012-04-12 3:16 jbrassow
2012-04-11 14:20 jbrassow
2012-02-13 11:10 zkabelac
2011-12-01 0:21 jbrassow
2011-09-13 16:33 jbrassow
2011-08-18 19:31 jbrassow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120411012330.22012.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=jbrassow@sourceware.org \
--cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.