From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:08:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH V3 1/5] ARM: kirkwood: Basic support for DNS-320 and DNS-325 In-Reply-To: <20120411141118.GG14790@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1332885255-8304-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> <20120411141118.GG14790@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <201204111508.46143.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 11 April 2012, Jason Cooper wrote: > > Thinking about it, MACH_DNSKW_DT would probably be best. Anything > > more general, e.g. MACH_DLINK_DNS_DT, would also cover the > > orion-based DNS-313/323/343. Presumably there will always be > > differences between kirkwood and orion5x? > > Hmm, Well, I think I would prefer MACH_DLINK_KIRKWOOD_DT, > MACH_DLINK_ORION5X_DT. This way, all the dtb's for a given manf/SoC are > built in one go, and the correct board-dt file is built as well. > > So, in my case, I would do MACH_GLOBALSCALE_KIRKWOOD_DT, and > MACH_GLOBALSCALE_ARMADA_DT. > > Grant, Arnd, sound sensible? I think it's fine, I just don't spend too much time on the naming when the goal is to eventually just have one config option for all manufacturers. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] ARM: kirkwood: Basic support for DNS-320 and DNS-325 Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:08:45 +0000 Message-ID: <201204111508.46143.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1332885255-8304-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> <20120411141118.GG14790@titan.lakedaemon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120411141118.GG14790-u4khhh1J0LxI1Ri9qeTfzeTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Jason Cooper Cc: Jamie Lentin , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 11 April 2012, Jason Cooper wrote: > > Thinking about it, MACH_DNSKW_DT would probably be best. Anything > > more general, e.g. MACH_DLINK_DNS_DT, would also cover the > > orion-based DNS-313/323/343. Presumably there will always be > > differences between kirkwood and orion5x? > > Hmm, Well, I think I would prefer MACH_DLINK_KIRKWOOD_DT, > MACH_DLINK_ORION5X_DT. This way, all the dtb's for a given manf/SoC are > built in one go, and the correct board-dt file is built as well. > > So, in my case, I would do MACH_GLOBALSCALE_KIRKWOOD_DT, and > MACH_GLOBALSCALE_ARMADA_DT. > > Grant, Arnd, sound sensible? I think it's fine, I just don't spend too much time on the naming when the goal is to eventually just have one config option for all manufacturers. Arnd