diff for duplicates of <20120412144626.GA14868@kroah.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index ddd3554..966b27d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:32:40PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.3.2 release. > >> >> > There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response -> >> >> > to this one. ?If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please +> >> >> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >> >> > let me know. > >> >> > > >> >> > Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 23:10:16 UTC 2012. @@ -24,14 +24,14 @@ On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:32:40PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> unusable without this patch; not only does the network doesn't work, > >> but quite often the kernel is stuck consuming 100% of the CPU. > >> -> >> > Have you read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? ?Based on that, I +> >> > Have you read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? Based on that, I > >> > don't think it can, yet, right? > >> > >> Why not? This patch makes the code go back to a previous state, it is > >> obviously more stable than the current state, and the code already > >> exists in Linus's tree (in previous releases). > > -> > It does? ?What is the git commit id of the patch? ?Based in the email +> > It does? What is the git commit id of the patch? Based in the email > > above, I assumed it had not made it to Linus's tree already. > > It's a revert of c1afdaff90538ef085b756454f12b29575411214, so so just diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index dcf53e3..5425c23 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,9 +5,19 @@ "ref\020120412011313.GA23764@kroah.com\0" "ref\0CAMP44s2q+bQE3-zsX4bs=sQDt4jf8eE5bwZ8V88UjodjRyAjog@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>\0" - "Subject\0[ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review\0" + "Subject\0Re: [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review\0" "Date\0Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:46:26 -0700\0" - "To\0ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org\0" + "To\0Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\0" + "Cc\0Sergio Correia <lists@uece.net>" + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + stable@vger.kernel.org + torvalds@linux-foundation.org + akpm@linux-foundation.org + alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk + linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> + Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com> + ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net> + " John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:32:40PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:\n" @@ -21,7 +31,7 @@ "> >> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:\n" "> >> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.3.2 release.\n" "> >> >> > There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response\n" - "> >> >> > to this one. ?If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please\n" + "> >> >> > to this one. \302\240If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please\n" "> >> >> > let me know.\n" "> >> >> >\n" "> >> >> > Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 23:10:16 UTC 2012.\n" @@ -36,14 +46,14 @@ "> >> unusable without this patch; not only does the network doesn't work,\n" "> >> but quite often the kernel is stuck consuming 100% of the CPU.\n" "> >>\n" - "> >> > Have you read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? ?Based on that, I\n" + "> >> > Have you read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? \302\240Based on that, I\n" "> >> > don't think it can, yet, right?\n" "> >>\n" "> >> Why not? This patch makes the code go back to a previous state, it is\n" "> >> obviously more stable than the current state, and the code already\n" "> >> exists in Linus's tree (in previous releases).\n" "> >\n" - "> > It does? ?What is the git commit id of the patch? ?Based in the email\n" + "> > It does? \302\240What is the git commit id of the patch? \302\240Based in the email\n" "> > above, I assumed it had not made it to Linus's tree already.\n" "> \n" "> It's a revert of c1afdaff90538ef085b756454f12b29575411214, so so just\n" @@ -68,4 +78,4 @@ "\n" greg k-h -6f2b0c83f5da4830db81302b633b02a0398322d2cddffe4a8f7b72ef4a75b65a +427b75f99cf56ca05588a41b361ab1dc95af85df740286036528548a58f9ca63
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index ddd3554..8d77089 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:32:40PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.3.2 release. > >> >> > There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response -> >> >> > to this one. ?If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please +> >> >> > to this one. �If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >> >> > let me know. > >> >> > > >> >> > Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 23:10:16 UTC 2012. @@ -24,14 +24,14 @@ On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:32:40PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> unusable without this patch; not only does the network doesn't work, > >> but quite often the kernel is stuck consuming 100% of the CPU. > >> -> >> > Have you read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? ?Based on that, I +> >> > Have you read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? �Based on that, I > >> > don't think it can, yet, right? > >> > >> Why not? This patch makes the code go back to a previous state, it is > >> obviously more stable than the current state, and the code already > >> exists in Linus's tree (in previous releases). > > -> > It does? ?What is the git commit id of the patch? ?Based in the email +> > It does? �What is the git commit id of the patch? �Based in the email > > above, I assumed it had not made it to Linus's tree already. > > It's a revert of c1afdaff90538ef085b756454f12b29575411214, so so just diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index dcf53e3..a018c36 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -5,9 +5,19 @@ "ref\020120412011313.GA23764@kroah.com\0" "ref\0CAMP44s2q+bQE3-zsX4bs=sQDt4jf8eE5bwZ8V88UjodjRyAjog@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>\0" - "Subject\0[ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review\0" + "Subject\0Re: [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review\0" "Date\0Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:46:26 -0700\0" - "To\0ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org\0" + "To\0Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\0" + "Cc\0Sergio Correia <lists@uece.net>" + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + stable@vger.kernel.org + torvalds@linux-foundation.org + akpm@linux-foundation.org + alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk + linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> + Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com> + ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net> + " John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:32:40PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:\n" @@ -21,7 +31,7 @@ "> >> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:\n" "> >> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.3.2 release.\n" "> >> >> > There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response\n" - "> >> >> > to this one. ?If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please\n" + "> >> >> > to this one. \303\257\302\277\302\275If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please\n" "> >> >> > let me know.\n" "> >> >> >\n" "> >> >> > Responses should be made by Fri Apr 13 23:10:16 UTC 2012.\n" @@ -36,14 +46,14 @@ "> >> unusable without this patch; not only does the network doesn't work,\n" "> >> but quite often the kernel is stuck consuming 100% of the CPU.\n" "> >>\n" - "> >> > Have you read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? ?Based on that, I\n" + "> >> > Have you read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? \303\257\302\277\302\275Based on that, I\n" "> >> > don't think it can, yet, right?\n" "> >>\n" "> >> Why not? This patch makes the code go back to a previous state, it is\n" "> >> obviously more stable than the current state, and the code already\n" "> >> exists in Linus's tree (in previous releases).\n" "> >\n" - "> > It does? ?What is the git commit id of the patch? ?Based in the email\n" + "> > It does? \303\257\302\277\302\275What is the git commit id of the patch? \303\257\302\277\302\275Based in the email\n" "> > above, I assumed it had not made it to Linus's tree already.\n" "> \n" "> It's a revert of c1afdaff90538ef085b756454f12b29575411214, so so just\n" @@ -68,4 +78,4 @@ "\n" greg k-h -6f2b0c83f5da4830db81302b633b02a0398322d2cddffe4a8f7b72ef4a75b65a +a3f95020e321d98f4fa083360e613ca3a156e1facb8eeaa4fb9834eb093a5f86
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.