From: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: Avoid zapping unrelated shadows in __kvm_set_memory_region()
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:12:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120414101220.7ddbca6b558e3e60d6612802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F84F64B.4090704@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:11:07 +0800
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > restart:
> > - list_for_each_entry_safe(sp, node, &kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages, link)
> > - if (kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list))
> > - goto restart;
> > + zapped = 0;
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(sp, node, &kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages, link) {
> > + if ((slot >= 0) && !test_bit(slot, sp->slot_bitmap))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + zapped |= kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list);
>
>
> You should "goto restart" here like the origin code, also, "safe" version of
> list_for_each is not needed.
Thank you for looking into this part.
I understand that we can eliminate _safe in the original implementation.
Can you tell me the reason why we should do "goto restart" immediately here?
For performance, or correctness issue?
I thought doing "goto restart" after the list scan would be more efficient.
Takuya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-14 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 13:05 [PATCH v2] KVM: Avoid zapping unrelated shadows in __kvm_set_memory_region() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-11 3:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 1:12 ` Takuya Yoshikawa [this message]
2012-04-16 3:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 21:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-14 1:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 12:35 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120414101220.7ddbca6b558e3e60d6612802@gmail.com \
--to=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.