diff for duplicates of <20120414111044.4930a5f3@stein> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 21b006d..1b7a578 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ On Apr 14 Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think Stefan meant the above as tongue-in-cheek, for what it's -> > worth. ?Another stable kernel with different rules really would be an +> > worth. Another stable kernel with different rules really would be an > > interesting exercise, and would probably fulfill a need for a certain > > audience. > > -> > It's not like nobody does that already, anyway. ?For example, I hear +> > It's not like nobody does that already, anyway. For example, I hear > > Fedora has a kernel that they maintain well for a different audience, > > using different rules. > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ ports are: months.) These downsides have been mentioned in the thread; please consider them. -It is not about "we? do this because we are set in our ways". The stable +It is not about "we¹ do this because we are set in our ways". The stable rules have pragmatic reasons which are for example founded on lessons learned from the 2.4/2.5/2.6 history of development, maintenance, and distribution. @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ mentioned several times, and I can't see what would invalidate any of these arguments. -------- -?) Greg, if you are still reading this thread: Excuse the 'we', I do not +¹) Greg, if you are still reading this thread: Excuse the 'we', I do not mean to speak for you. Besides, Greg, thank you for the work. As a driver maintainer and when diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index f23fae5..dc1011b 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -11,19 +11,32 @@ "ref\020120413230525.GA13995@burratino\0" "ref\0CAMP44s0OdVBTwVtCoru-xvB=LVtO56jgku7X-0a7mUz1=iVCzw@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>\0" - "Subject\0[ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review\0" + "Subject\0Re: [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review\0" "Date\0Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:10:44 +0200\0" - "To\0ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org\0" + "To\0Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\0" + "Cc\0Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>" + Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> + Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> + Sergio Correia <lists@uece.net> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + stable@vger.kernel.org + torvalds@linux-foundation.org + akpm@linux-foundation.org + alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk + linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> + Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com> + ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net> + " John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Apr 14 Felipe Contreras wrote:\n" "> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:\n" "> > I don't think Stefan meant the above as tongue-in-cheek, for what it's\n" - "> > worth. ?Another stable kernel with different rules really would be an\n" + "> > worth. \302\240Another stable kernel with different rules really would be an\n" "> > interesting exercise, and would probably fulfill a need for a certain\n" "> > audience.\n" "> >\n" - "> > It's not like nobody does that already, anyway. ?For example, I hear\n" + "> > It's not like nobody does that already, anyway. \302\240For example, I hear\n" "> > Fedora has a kernel that they maintain well for a different audience,\n" "> > using different rules.\n" "> \n" @@ -86,7 +99,7 @@ " months.)\n" "\n" "These downsides have been mentioned in the thread; please consider them.\n" - "It is not about \"we? do this because we are set in our ways\". The stable\n" + "It is not about \"we\302\271 do this because we are set in our ways\". The stable\n" "rules have pragmatic reasons which are for example founded on lessons\n" "learned from the 2.4/2.5/2.6 history of development, maintenance, and\n" "distribution.\n" @@ -96,7 +109,7 @@ "these arguments.\n" "\n" "--------\n" - "?) Greg, if you are still reading this thread: Excuse the 'we', I do not\n" + "\302\271) Greg, if you are still reading this thread: Excuse the 'we', I do not\n" "mean to speak for you.\n" "\n" "Besides, Greg, thank you for the work. As a driver maintainer and when\n" @@ -109,4 +122,4 @@ "-=====-===-- -=-- -===-\n" http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -3a30ee2a59393f10317f27edf7973aa5a1f1ecd30d09453074472d9c466b1503 +9a7877391af927af145c3ad859b4411df57fb3e7052a49c39913465b906a327e
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.