From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] memcg remove pre_destroy Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:41:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20120416224118.GG12421@google.com> References: <4F86B9BE.8000105@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZF3Vkf1/v6cKQDLI6WSUcVnE3fXxY8bgF+wHse7WiFI=; b=hdXsZuJUSK57C6zmHUIAjTqBD3tt7q0+BEmz+pC3SeP4PhfsqtR3yN56qpdrBZzHm3 hFKUrok1K6Y+KyHOxPhQ+EpxViGi7Cm/ibCzjeeynAi/Noxki2ZkqUCwY/dHBeFAzrnY WIXtGuBdWE5lhFWNa1IhBei3USbUMch+F7vpnNhU6Yy+SQsIfAIaxersLpyjHN20CzQk wjQ2M+hcP7hEsHz/dVhNie6KCwDTeIVShBbs+K/8xacaicd+h7osg0HnCi4sLKWuU80Y NR1PaO4Gd8bH0gB4LhqEQyPRLMkMX+IUovIWz7YVjTn6ZVFLrfLW/w1w3VzZYDpWEG0D IeKA== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F86B9BE.8000105-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org" , "cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Glauber Costa , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton Hello, KAMEZAWA. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:17:18PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > In recent discussion, Tejun Heo, cgroup maintainer, has a plan to remove > ->pre_destroy(). And now, in cgroup tree, pre_destroy() failure cause WARNING. I did a pretty shallow review of the patchset and other than the unnecessary async destruction, my complaints are mostly trivial. Ooh, and the patchset doesn't apply cleanly on top of cgroup/for-3.5. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-3.5 Thank you! -- tejun From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx146.postini.com [74.125.245.146]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE4F86B0044 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:41:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by dakh32 with SMTP id h32so8041262dak.9 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:41:18 -0700 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] memcg remove pre_destroy Message-ID: <20120416224118.GG12421@google.com> References: <4F86B9BE.8000105@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F86B9BE.8000105@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "cgroups@vger.kernel.org" , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Glauber Costa , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton Hello, KAMEZAWA. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:17:18PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > In recent discussion, Tejun Heo, cgroup maintainer, has a plan to remove > ->pre_destroy(). And now, in cgroup tree, pre_destroy() failure cause WARNING. I did a pretty shallow review of the patchset and other than the unnecessary async destruction, my complaints are mostly trivial. Ooh, and the patchset doesn't apply cleanly on top of cgroup/for-3.5. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-3.5 Thank you! -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org