From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cavium: Don't enable irq in ->init__secondary()
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:08:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120417030848.GA6377@zhy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8C4D4E.4060900@gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:48:14AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 12:25 AM, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >From: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang@windriver.com>
> >
> >Too early to enable irq will break some following action,
> >such as notify_cpu_starting().
>
> Can you be more specific about what breaks?
For example:
CPU1 CPU2
__cpu_up();
mp_ops->boot_secondary();
start_secondary();
octeon_init_secondary();
raw_local_irq_enable();
<IRQ>
do something;
wake up softirqd;
try_to_wake_up();
select_fallback_rq();
/* select wrong cpu */
set_cpu_online();
>
> >
> >I don't get side effect with this patch.
>
> Without this, where do irqs get enabled on the secondary CPUs?
cpu_idle() will handle it. But in fact we should not depend on
cpu_idle().
But it seems there is not suitable place to put local_irq_enable(),
though ->smp_finish() looks like a more suitable place.
When looking more at smp support on MIPS, there is more things I find.
Such as set_cpu_online() is called on CPU1, so there will be another race
window like above scenario. Please take a look at what commit 2baab4e9
intend to resolve.
Thanks,
Yong
>
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> >Cc: David Daney<ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
> >Cc: Ralf Baechle<ralf@linux-mips.org>
> >---
> > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c | 1 -
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >index 97e7ce9..7e65c88 100644
> >--- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >+++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >@@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static void __cpuinit octeon_init_secondary(void)
> > octeon_init_cvmcount();
> >
> > octeon_irq_setup_secondary();
> >- raw_local_irq_enable();
> > }
> >
> > /**
--
Only stand for myself
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 7:25 [PATCH] MIPS: cavium: Don't enable irq in ->init__secondary() Yong Zhang
2012-04-16 16:48 ` David Daney
2012-04-17 3:08 ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2012-04-17 20:45 ` David Daney
2012-04-18 12:55 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120417030848.GA6377@zhy \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.