From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:34:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204171434.06178.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1334660431.git.viresh.kumar@st.com>
On Tuesday 17 April 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> SPEAr now supports common clock framework. This patchset contains changes
> related to this. It also contain few dependency commits for clock framework that
> are earlier sent separately.
>
> @Mike: It would be easiest to get these through ARM-SoC tree. So, would need
> your Acked-by on these patches. But firstly they must get reivewed :)
We should agree on how we want to do the common clk patches for v3.5.
The two options I see are either we take all the patches that Mike
Acks into arm-soc, or Mike applies the patches in his own tree and
submits them to arm-soc. I think either way is fine for me, but
some people might feel strongly one way or another.
> MAINTAINERS | 4 +-
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/clock.c | 1354 +++++++++--------------
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/include/mach/generic.h | 4 +-
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/include/mach/misc_regs.h | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/include/mach/spear.h | 13 +
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear300.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear310.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear320.c | 12 +-
> arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear3xx.c | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/clock.c | 1015 +++++------------
> arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/include/mach/misc_regs.h | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/spear6xx.c | 5 +-
> arch/arm/plat-spear/Makefile | 3 +-
> arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-aux-synth.c | 195 ++++
> arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-frac-synth.c | 156 +++
> arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-gpt-synth.c | 145 +++
> arch/arm/plat-spear/clk-vco-pll.c | 346 ++++++
> arch/arm/plat-spear/clock.c | 1005 -----------------
I wonder: should the clock drivers remain part of the platform directory,
or get moved into a subdirectory of drivers/clk? I was assuming that
we'd do the latter, but I haven't been following the clk discussions
that closely.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 11:15 [PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 01/13] CLKDEV: Add helper routines to allocate and add clkdevs for given struct clk * Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 02/13] clk: Fix typo in comment Viresh Kumar
2012-04-18 21:04 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 03/13] " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] clk: clk-private: Add DEFINE_CLK macro Viresh Kumar
2012-04-18 21:01 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 05/13] clk: clk-gate: Create clk_gate_endisable() Viresh Kumar
2012-04-18 21:02 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] clk: Don't set clk->new_rate twice Viresh Kumar
2012-04-18 21:08 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 07/13] clk: clk_set_rate() must fail if CLK_SET_RATE_GATE is set and clk is enabled Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 08/13] SPEAr: clk: Add VCO-PLL Synthesizer clock Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 09/13] SPEAr: clk: Add Auxiliary " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 18:51 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-17 20:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-18 20:01 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 10/13] SPEAr: clk: Add Fractional " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 11/13] SPEAr: clk: Add General Purpose Timer " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 11:15 ` [PATCH 13/13] SPEAr: Call clk_prepare() before calling clk_enable Viresh Kumar
2012-04-17 17:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-04-18 21:17 ` Turquette, Mike
[not found] ` <CAOh2x=maawrRjHhE3oGXfMOvsUbCkp9gWA_Kq-S0Dh7r6co6VA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-19 18:56 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-17 14:34 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-04-17 14:57 ` [PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework Shawn Guo
2012-04-18 20:49 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-18 20:45 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-18 21:13 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-18 21:22 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-18 21:25 ` Turquette, Mike
[not found] ` <CAOh2x=nhZLQejWJb1Wdv=G9vU0hq+8CO0SSx95qQUJogL5ftNQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-19 0:17 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-19 8:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-19 9:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-04-19 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-19 19:01 ` Turquette, Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201204171434.06178.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.