From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RFC [patch] sched,cgroup_sched: convince RT_GROUP_SCHED throttle to work
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:48:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120418074803.GB19328@zhy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334730470.5616.33.camel@marge.simpson.net>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:27:50AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:20 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
>
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > @@ -5875,6 +5875,11 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s
> > > sd->child = NULL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (sd)
> > > + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_isolated_map);
> > > + else
> > > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_isolated_map);
> > > +
> >
> > Do we allow this?
>
> Yeah, isolating CPUS 2-3...
Hmm...magic cpuset ;-)
>
> [ 3011.444345] CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> [ 3011.448719] CPU1 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> [ 3011.453107] CPU2 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> [ 3011.457466] CPU3 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> [ 3011.461892] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 3011.465813] domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
> [ 3011.469761] groups: 0 1
> [ 3011.472415] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 3011.476333] domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
> [ 3011.480266] groups: 1 0
> [ 3011.482988] CPU2 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 3011.486919] domain 0: span 2-3 level MC
> [ 3011.490851] groups: 2 3
> [ 3011.493502] CPU3 attaching sched-domain:
> [ 3011.497422] domain 0: span 2-3 level MC
> [ 3011.501367] groups: 3 2
> [ 3011.504214] CPU2 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> [ 3011.508569] CPU3 attaching NULL sched-domain.
But another scenario comes into head:
What will happen when a rt_rq is throttled the very CPU is
attached to NULL domain?
Thanks,
Yong
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Only stand for myself
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-03 9:08 [patch] sched,rt: non-isolated cores lift isolcpus throttle for CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED Mike Galbraith
2012-04-03 9:19 ` [patch] sched,rt: let the user see rt queues in /proc/sched_debug Mike Galbraith
2012-04-07 8:58 ` [patch] sched,cgroup_sched: fix up task_groups list buglet Mike Galbraith
2012-04-07 9:54 ` RFC [patch] sched,cgroup_sched: convince RT_GROUP_SCHED throttle to work Mike Galbraith
2012-04-10 9:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-14 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 3:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-15 3:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-15 4:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-18 5:20 ` Yong Zhang
2012-04-18 6:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-18 7:48 ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2012-04-18 8:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-19 6:34 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120418074803.GB19328@zhy \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.