From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Prem Karat Subject: Re: Biweekly upstream qemu-kvm test report (using autotest) - Week 16 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:16:16 +0530 Message-ID: <20120419154616.GA4959@d6fc318.ibm.com> References: <20120403170814.GB4938@d6fc318.ibm.com> <20120419092954.GA3993@d6fc318.ibm.com> <1334844819.2691.5.camel@freedom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Mark K. Wisner" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, autotest@test.kernel.org, "PRADEEP K. SURISETTY" , "Ryan A. Harper" To: Amos Kong Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autotest-bounces@test.kernel.org Errors-To: autotest-bounces@test.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 04/19/12 10:50pm, Amos Kong wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues > wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 14:59 +0530, Prem Karat wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > This is a test report on upstream qemu-kvm testing > > (24853eece248d4a58d705c). > > > Tests were executed using latest autotest git (6a15572d5307fa0b). > > > > > > This time we have tested 3 guests. > > > > > > We are analysing the test results further to find out if the failure is > > in > > > autotest or in qemu-kvm. Will post the analysis asap and report bugs to > > > appropriate community. > > > > Ok, great initiative! I have a similar job here, but we use the block > > virtio drivers only, and qcow 2. I need to go over your results and see > > if they match mine. > > > > Thanks, will keep in touch, > > > > > Hi Prem, > > Where can we see the whole autotest log results? you can share it to a > public HTTP server. > It can help us to analyze the problem. > > Thanks, Amos. Amos, As soon as I find out an appropriate public server to post the logs, will do so and keep you posted. -- -prem