All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] DRM locking issues during early open
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:41:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120419164125.GI4256@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9tzWO46u5L1jnRvi_zhgOhmzH1df7cQTnP6+0Kh4Znpn7g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:30:03PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> wrote:
> > We have been carrying a (rather poor) patch for an issue we identified in
> > the DRM driver.  This issue is triggered when a DRM device is initialising
> > and userspace attempts to open it, typically in response to the sysfs
> > device added event.  Basically we allocate the minor numbers making
> > the device available, and then call the drm load callback.  Until this
> > completes the device is really not ready and these early opens typically
> > lead to oopses.
> >
> > We have been using the following patch to avoid this by marking the minors
> > as in error until the load method has completed.  This avoids the early
> > open by simply erroring out the opens with EAGAIN.  Obviously we should
> > be delaying the open until the load method complete.
> >
> > I include the existing patch for completness (it is not really ready for
> > merging) to illustrate the issue.  I think it is logical that the wait
> > should simply be delayed until the load has completed.  I am proposing
> > to include a wait queue associated with the idr cache for the drm minors
> > which we can use to allow open callers to wait_event_interruptible() on.
> > I'll be putting together a prototype shortly and will follow up with it.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> 
> Couldn't we just delay registering things until the driver is ready to
> accept an open?

It's somewhere on my eternal&epic todo list.

> Granted the midlayer of drm doesn't make that easy,

... after fixing this one ;-)

> thanks for sending this out, it keeps falling off my radar, I don't
> think I've ever seen this reported on RHEL/Fedora, which makes me
> wonder what we are doing that makes us lucky.

I think it's just a matter of races, if you load the drm module early
enough (like fedora does already in the initrd) and ensure that nothing
pokes drm devices for a few seconds, you'll be fine. Iirc ubuntus powerd
stuff is really got at brining everything down. Also, not loading the
module with udev, but loading it with X resulted in nice fireworks last
time I've tried that (radeon ums was trying to set up the card while the
kms code was doing the same, hilarity ensued).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-19 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-19 16:22 [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] DRM locking issues during early open Andy Whitcroft
2012-04-19 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/1] drm -- stop early access to drm devices Andy Whitcroft
2012-04-19 16:30 ` [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] DRM locking issues during early open Dave Airlie
2012-04-19 16:41   ` Andy Whitcroft
2012-04-19 16:47     ` Dave Airlie
2012-04-19 16:47       ` Dave Airlie
2012-04-19 16:52       ` Dave Airlie
2012-04-19 16:55         ` Jesse Barnes
2012-04-19 16:56           ` Dave Airlie
2012-04-19 17:00             ` Dave Airlie
2012-04-19 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-04-20  9:40 ` Dave Airlie
2012-04-20 10:31   ` Andy Whitcroft
2012-04-20 10:34     ` Dave Airlie
2012-04-20 17:25       ` Andy Whitcroft
2012-04-20 17:25         ` Andy Whitcroft

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120419164125.GI4256@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.