From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>, David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] cred: change keyctl_session_to_parent() to use task_work_add()
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:40:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120419184013.GA31862@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120419181010.GA29793@redhat.com>
On 04/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 04/19, David Howells wrote:
> >
> > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > But I certainly do not want to put these changes in 3/3 or in this series.
> >
> > Why not? It seems the correct place for them.
>
> I wanted to discuss the functional changes first, then send the trivial
> cleanups. And the changes in arch/ are always painful. And, "remove
> tracehook_notify_resume" is a bit off-topic, but I do not want to change
> the same code in arch/ twice.
That said, if you do not agree with 3/3 without "remove the call sites",
I'll send v6 which doesn't rename key_replace_session_keyring() but
updates the old callers:
arch/alpha/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/avr32/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/blackfin/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/c6x/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/cris/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 -
arch/frv/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/h8300/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/hexagon/kernel/signal.c | 3 +-
arch/ia64/kernel/process.c | 2 -
arch/m32r/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/mips/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/s390/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/sh/kernel/signal_32.c | 2 -
arch/sh/kernel/signal_64.c | 2 -
arch/sparc/kernel/signal_32.c | 2 -
arch/sparc/kernel/signal_64.c | 2 -
arch/tile/kernel/process.c | 2 -
arch/unicore32/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
include/linux/key.h | 4 --
include/linux/sched.h | 2 -
kernel/cred.c | 9 -----
security/keys/internal.h | 2 +
security/keys/keyctl.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
security/keys/process_keys.c | 20 ++++-------
30 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
I am not going to argue, but honestly I don't think it is a good
idea to mix the functional changes in keyctl.c and the simple
(but obviously untested) cleanups.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-19 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-14 2:12 [PATCH v4 0/3] task_work_add (was: task_work_queue) Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] task_work_add: generic process-context callbacks Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 2:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 3:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 13:53 ` David Howells
2012-04-17 16:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 3:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 8:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 20:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] genirq: reimplement exit_irq_thread() hook via task_work_add() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 14:11 ` David Howells
2012-04-17 16:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] cred: change keyctl_session_to_parent() to use task_work_add() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 14:23 ` David Howells
2012-04-17 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 19:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 16:52 ` David Howells
2012-04-19 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 17:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 17:55 ` David Howells
2012-04-19 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 18:40 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-04-19 19:34 ` David Howells
2012-04-19 19:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 22:26 ` David Howells
2012-04-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] task_work_add (was: task_work_queue) Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 3:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 18:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-14 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120419184013.GA31862@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dsmith@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.