From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"matthltc@us.ibm.com" <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@parallels.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file-update-after-mm- num_exe_file_vmas-removal.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:32:52 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120419223252.GV1893@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120419220918.GA5474@redhat.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:09:19AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > I guess maybe it's time to drop one-shot requirement and as result
> > we can drop MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED bit completely,
>
> Plus perhaps we can remove this for_each_vma check?
>
> > making overall code simplier?
>
> Personally I'd certainly prefer this ;)
>
> But let me repeat to avoid the confusion. I am fine either way,
> I am not going to discuss this again unless I see something which
> looks technically wrong. And the current MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED
> doesn't look right even if the problem is minor.
So if there no stong agrues against, lets rip all together --
and for_each_vma and MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED bits, finally making
code simplier.
Cyrill
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-19 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-19 18:52 + c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file-update-after-mm-num_exe_file_vmas-removal.patch added to -mm tree akpm
2012-04-19 19:20 ` + c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file-update-after-mm- num_exe_file_vmas-removal.patch " Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 21:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-04-19 21:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 21:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-04-19 22:08 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-04-19 22:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-04-19 22:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 21:46 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-04-19 21:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 22:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-04-19 22:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 22:28 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-04-19 22:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120419223252.GV1893@moon \
--to=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.