From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RTM_NEWLINK not received by application when connecting multiple devices simultaneously
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:14:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420081400.67a98836@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfDRXih39RVnx1P72due=_v9-ORWf=YUfUTPKcvVbNzVuTLdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:07:42 +0200
Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you very much for all the help.
>
> >> I spent some more time debugging this now. It turns out that which
> >> interface is seen by my application is not random, it is always the
> >> first one that is connected. This indicates that the bug is that the
> >> netlink message contains information about more than one interface.
> >> However, I am not able to prove this.
> >
> > There is no filtering. A dump request always returns all interfaces.
>
> I think maybe I didnt explain myself clearly enough, I am sorry. This
> does not happen when I dump interface info, but at the event of
> connecting two interfaces at the same time.
>
> I have now converted the application to using libmnl, but I still see
> the same error. There is one message that is not received by my
> netlink socket, or at least, the application does not process it. Just
> in case it was bundled together with the message about the first
> interface, I tried adding a loop where I received the packets (similar
> to the one in the -dump example). However, this did not help.
>
> -Kristian
Check if ip command catches the events (ip monitor).
What is the type of device? and what do you mean by connecting?
(ie installing, doing admin up, operstate transition, carrier)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-19 11:44 RTM_NEWLINK not received by application when connecting multiple devices simultaneously Kristian Evensen
2012-04-19 14:26 ` Ben Greear
2012-04-19 14:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-04-19 15:07 ` Kristian Evensen
2012-04-19 19:54 ` Kristian Evensen
2012-04-19 20:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-04-20 14:07 ` Kristian Evensen
2012-04-20 15:14 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2012-04-20 15:54 ` Kristian Evensen
2012-04-20 16:04 ` Kristian Evensen
2012-04-20 16:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120420081400.67a98836@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=kristian.evensen@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.