From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754343Ab2DTV1e (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:27:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40772 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753593Ab2DTV1d (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:27:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:26:54 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , Jason Baron , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hendrik Brueckner , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] (Was: syscall_regfunc() && TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT) Message-ID: <20120420212654.GA11156@redhat.com> References: <20120330183104.GA12927@redhat.com> <1333134131.23924.191.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20120330201550.GA16628@redhat.com> <1333152806.23924.196.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20120331204501.GA18572@redhat.com> <1333229859.23924.200.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20120401213748.GA17795@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120401213748.GA17795@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Should I resend this or we do not really care? The problem is minor, but both patches look like the simple and obvious bugfix to me. On 04/01, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 03/31, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 22:45 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > > So what do you think we should do, > > > > > > - keep this check > > > > > > - remove it > > > > > > - remove it in a separate patch > > > > I say this one (remove it in a separate patch). That way if something > > breaks we know exactly what did it ;-) > > OK, agreed. > > Don't really know how can I test this... but the kernel didn't > crash after I enabled the syscall tracer ;) > > Oleg.