From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:18:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 12/17] ARM clps711x: Simple optimise debug_macro by removing one NOP In-Reply-To: <1334999490-27177-13-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> References: <1334999490-27177-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> <1334999490-27177-13-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> Message-ID: <201204211118.23857.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Saturday 21 April 2012, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > .macro addruart, rp, rv, tmp > -#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_CLPS711X_UART2 > - mov \rp, #0x0000 @ UART1 > -#else > - mov \rp, #0x1000 @ UART2 > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_CLPS711X_UART2 > + mov \rp, #0x1000 @ Add offset for UART2 base reg > #endif > orr \rv, \rp, #CLPS711X_VIRT_BASE > orr \rp, \rp, #CLPS711X_PHYS_BASE This looks wrong at first sight. Is rp guaranteed to be zero when calling the macro? Am I misreading this? Sorry my ARM assembly skill is still horrible. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754721Ab2DULSh (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2012 07:18:37 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:50124 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751052Ab2DULSg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2012 07:18:36 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/17] ARM clps711x: Simple optimise debug_macro by removing one NOP Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:18:23 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.3.0-rc1; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Alexander Shiyan , Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1334999490-27177-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> <1334999490-27177-13-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <1334999490-27177-13-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204211118.23857.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:TpvpaiMFg2J488Nuit3jG71AHWpjhkd77xMfetVSfV7 xdb8mhzblyENoOPebuH9sCY5e7+qngkl15OnerZBE0ttnuCNqP i19dpa0/gU+HyhoZFkbqwNxuCgcE/qA4BfNuLhqCjTo2+QTtNX WFoKFJCvL4xQSKgaN6xIxw2MbPkf2+sQfnbiEBJUsbr7vq9Z1i be6Q8FgXxpceIvLWQj0hyVh8ZX1eE7J344gvvw9EWyIT/YFrm+ oiC0AMbkrV4dlunB/pV/SuMTgCnqB5JFppWd+G+vbrTa5goTUi wk8exHOHUpwiPpgDbzKQ+45XC2RIOmUydE4NBxMidg1hid+vXS mJR6hdVNHGYDEsNSTo/4= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 21 April 2012, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > .macro addruart, rp, rv, tmp > -#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_CLPS711X_UART2 > - mov \rp, #0x0000 @ UART1 > -#else > - mov \rp, #0x1000 @ UART2 > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_CLPS711X_UART2 > + mov \rp, #0x1000 @ Add offset for UART2 base reg > #endif > orr \rv, \rp, #CLPS711X_VIRT_BASE > orr \rp, \rp, #CLPS711X_PHYS_BASE This looks wrong at first sight. Is rp guaranteed to be zero when calling the macro? Am I misreading this? Sorry my ARM assembly skill is still horrible. Arnd