From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:40:11 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/11 V4] MXS: Add i.MX28 USB Host driver In-Reply-To: References: <1334771194-18688-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201204231409.55131.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <201204231440.11469.marex@denx.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Dear Chen Peter-B29397, > > > From my point, you'd better step by step, first, mainline host and phy. > > > then, gadget. At last OTG if you have been interested in. > > > > OTG is certainly going last, I still have to figure that out. I wanted to > > add > > gadget to see how this whole thing will work together to avoid design > > mistakes. > > I agree. Current, it is lack of generic PHY layer, so only one PHY can > be supported at board if you want to use PHY driver. Yes, that's indeed a problem. Doesn't seem to be a hard one though. > I would like to > submit some generic PHY layer code, but some many internal stuffs in hands > now. Good :) > > > > It can be easier for your mainline, as some of them have still not > > > implemented at your local. What's your opinion, Sascha? > > > > I don't follow here, what do you mean? > > My original mind is step by step, but you want to implement the whole > structure to see if there is any design mistakes, it is also OK. Yes exactly ... I believe it's better this way to see how it works out. I'll try OTG tonight if nothing more important pops up. > > Best regards, > > Marek Vasut Best regards, Marek Vasut