From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx16.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.21]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3OHXMiF019895 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:33:22 -0400 Received: from www.bettercgi.com (www.bettercgi.com [74.122.122.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3OHXEEG018041 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:33:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (r74-192-17-33.bcstcmta01.clsttx.tl.dh.suddenlink.net [74.192.17.33]) by www.bettercgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B792213D4 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:33:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:33:12 -0500 From: Ray Morris Message-ID: <20120424123312.31542cda@bettercgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvremove snapshot hangs LVM system Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com > Well, I suppose no one else had this problem. I suppose not. I got a hang using snapshots atop mdadm raid, but I see no mention of such in your message or log. I do see selinux calls in your stack trace. It would take only seconds to setenforce 0 and test that way, and longer to disable selinux entirely and test it. In the best case, you'd find it's selinux related. In the worst case, you'd shorten up your stack trace, narrowing down the problem. Not that I'm advocating turning off selinux in general, but since selinux is in the stack trace a quick test with selinux off for a momment might be useful. -- Ray Morris support@bettercgi.com Strongbox - The next generation in site security: http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/ Throttlebox - Intelligent Bandwidth Control http://www.bettercgi.com/throttlebox/ Strongbox / Throttlebox affiliate program: http://www.bettercgi.com/affiliates/user/register.php On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:27:16 +0200 Da wrote: > Well, I suppose no one else had this problem. > > Does it mean that no one is using snapshots in a clvm environment? or > that they just work for everybody? > > Just to keep it updated: > I tried withe the last soft versions and the same happens, the > "lvremove" of a snapshot just hangs my lvm system. > Here the versions I am using: > > kernel-2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64 > cman-3.0.12.1-23.el6.x86_64 > corosync-1.4.1-4.el6.x86_64 > corosynclib-1.4.1-4.el6.x86_64 > lvm2-cluster-2.02.88-3.el6.x86_64 > lvm2-libs-2.02.88-3.el6.x86_64 > lvm2-2.02.88-3.el6.x86_64 > lvm2-devel-2.02.88-3.el6.x86_64 > fence-virt-0.2.3-5.el6.x86_64 > fence-agents-3.1.5-10.el6.x86_64 > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ >