From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown
<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Laxman Dewangan
<ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org,
olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] i2c: tegra: support for I2C_M_NOSTART protocol mangling
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120424130118.GD4030@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120424124030.GD13747-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 667 bytes --]
> > * We should allocate a new functionality flag for it.
> > * We should update the documentation to reflect the two use cases.
>
> That sounds like a good plan. I'll try to get round to it if nobody
> beats me to it.
Would it make sense to make all four I2C_M_* mangling features seperate
I2C_FUNC_* options? The old I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING could then be all
four (seperately) exposed mangling features ORed. That's what I was
wondering when looking at the patch.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
ben-linux@fluff.org, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, olof@lixom.net,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] i2c: tegra: support for I2C_M_NOSTART protocol mangling
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120424130118.GD4030@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120424124030.GD13747@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 667 bytes --]
> > * We should allocate a new functionality flag for it.
> > * We should update the documentation to reflect the two use cases.
>
> That sounds like a good plan. I'll try to get round to it if nobody
> beats me to it.
Would it make sense to make all four I2C_M_* mangling features seperate
I2C_FUNC_* options? The old I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING could then be all
four (seperately) exposed mangling features ORed. That's what I was
wondering when looking at the patch.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-24 7:19 [PATCH V1 0/2] i2c: tegra: 10 bit and M_NOSTART support Laxman Dewangan
2012-04-24 7:19 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-04-24 7:19 ` [PATCH V1 1/2] i2c: tegra: fix 10bit address configuration Laxman Dewangan
[not found] ` <1335251976-31925-2-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-24 8:58 ` Jean Delvare
2012-04-24 8:58 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20120424105815.1d9e7d95-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-03 6:13 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-03 6:13 ` Laxman Dewangan
[not found] ` <4FA221FA.2030305-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-03 8:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-05-03 8:18 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120503081830.GA9574-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-03 8:20 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-03 8:20 ` Laxman Dewangan
[not found] ` <1335251976-31925-1-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-24 7:19 ` [PATCH V1 2/2] i2c: tegra: support for I2C_M_NOSTART protocol mangling Laxman Dewangan
2012-04-24 7:19 ` Laxman Dewangan
[not found] ` <1335251976-31925-3-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-24 8:55 ` Jean Delvare
2012-04-24 8:55 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20120424105557.7ac07232-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-24 9:21 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-04-24 9:21 ` Laxman Dewangan
[not found] ` <4F967089.3050004-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-24 11:38 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-24 11:38 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-24 12:32 ` Jean Delvare
2012-04-24 12:32 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20120424143241.0d66fd2e-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-24 12:40 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-24 12:40 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20120424124030.GD13747-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-24 13:01 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-04-24 13:01 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120424130118.GD4030-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-24 13:07 ` Jean Delvare
2012-04-24 13:07 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20120424150750.36f8c2fc-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-24 13:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-24 13:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-05-10 11:24 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-10 11:24 ` Laxman Dewangan
[not found] ` <4FABA585.7090600-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-10 11:54 ` Jean Delvare
2012-05-10 11:54 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20120510135411.3ba5bb6d-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-10 12:20 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-10 12:20 ` Laxman Dewangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120424130118.GD4030@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.