From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Tobias Geiger <tobias.geiger@vido.info>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Degregated I/O Performance since 3.4 - Regression in 3.4?
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:30:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120424163027.GI3213@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204241607.24864.tobias.geiger@vido.info>
> > > I redid the test;
> > >
> > > a) with 3.3.0 kernel
> > > b) with 3.4.0-rc4
> > > c) with 3.40-rc4 and above patch
> > >
> > > everything else remained the same, i.e. test-program and test-scenario
> > > was not changed and started after about 5min of domu bootup (so that no
> > > strange bootup-effects become relevant); same phy-backend (lvm on ssd),
> > > same everything else; so i cant see what else except the used dom0
> > > kernel is causing this issue; but here are the numbers:
> > >
> > > a) read: 135mb/s write: 142mb/s
> > > b) read: 39mb/s write: 39mb/s
> > > c) read: 40mb/s write: 40mb/s
> > >
> > > Only thing that may become relevant is the difference in kernel-config
> > > betwen 3.3 and 3.4 - here's the diff :
> > > http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=Dy71Fegq
> > >
> > > Jan, it seems you're right: The patch doesn't add extra performance
> > > regression - i guess i had an i/o intensive task running in dom0 while
> > > doing the benchmark yesterday, so that the write performance got so bad.
> > > sorry for that.
> > >
> > > Still there's a significant performance penalty from 3.3 to 3.4
> >
> > Could you please try to revert the following commits?
> >
> > git revert -n a71e23d9925517e609dfcb72b5874f33cdb0d2ad
No way
> > git revert -n 3389bb8bf76180eecaffdfa7dd5b35fa4a2ce9b5
Startup.
> > git revert -n 4dae76705fc8f9854bb732f9944e7ff9ba7a8e9f
Hm, this is just during startup.
> > git revert -n b2167ba6dd89d55ced26a867fad8f0fe388fd595
No way.
> > git revert -n 4f14faaab4ee46a046b6baff85644be199de718c
Perhaps? But I am not seeing it.
> > git revert -n 9846ff10af12f9e7caac696737db6c990592a74a
Perhaps?
>
> after reverting said 6 commits (thanks for the ids of these - had difficulties
> to find them), the performance is back to normal.
>
> should i try to circle it down to one of this 6, or do you have a hint on
> which it might be?
I think either off these: 4f14faaab4ee46a046b6baff85644be199de718c
9846ff10af12f9e7caac696737db6c990592a74a might be the culprit.
Try the 9846ff10 first.
>
> Greetings
> Tobias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 10:02 Degregated I/O Performance since 3.4 - Regression in 3.4? Tobias Geiger
2012-04-23 11:53 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-04-23 15:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-23 20:53 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-04-24 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-24 12:09 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-04-24 12:52 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-04-24 14:07 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-04-24 14:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-04-24 16:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-04-24 23:21 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-04-25 13:44 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-04-25 13:57 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-04-25 15:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-04-25 15:03 ` Tobias Geiger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120424163027.GI3213@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tobias.geiger@vido.info \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.