From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx186.postini.com [74.125.245.186]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEB026B004A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:25:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:25:46 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH next 00/12] mm: replace struct mem_cgroup_zone with struct lruvec Message-Id: <20120426162546.90991b7c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120426074632.18961.17803.stgit@zurg> References: <20120426074632.18961.17803.stgit@zurg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:53:44 +0400 Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > This patchset depends on Johannes Weiner's patch > "mm: memcg: count pte references from every member of the reclaimed hierarchy". > > bloat-o-meter delta for patches 2..12 > > add/remove: 6/6 grow/shrink: 6/14 up/down: 4414/-4625 (-211) That's the sole effect and intent of the patchset? To save 211 bytes? > ... > > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 16 +-- > include/linux/mmzone.h | 14 ++ > mm/memcontrol.c | 33 +++-- > mm/mmzone.c | 14 ++ > mm/page_alloc.c | 8 - > mm/vmscan.c | 277 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 6 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-) If so, I'm not sure that it is worth the risk and effort? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759472Ab2DZXZt (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:25:49 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:46203 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754123Ab2DZXZs (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:25:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:25:46 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH next 00/12] mm: replace struct mem_cgroup_zone with struct lruvec Message-Id: <20120426162546.90991b7c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120426074632.18961.17803.stgit@zurg> References: <20120426074632.18961.17803.stgit@zurg> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:53:44 +0400 Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > This patchset depends on Johannes Weiner's patch > "mm: memcg: count pte references from every member of the reclaimed hierarchy". > > bloat-o-meter delta for patches 2..12 > > add/remove: 6/6 grow/shrink: 6/14 up/down: 4414/-4625 (-211) That's the sole effect and intent of the patchset? To save 211 bytes? > ... > > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 16 +-- > include/linux/mmzone.h | 14 ++ > mm/memcontrol.c | 33 +++-- > mm/mmzone.c | 14 ++ > mm/page_alloc.c | 8 - > mm/vmscan.c | 277 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 6 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-) If so, I'm not sure that it is worth the risk and effort?