All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	markgross@thegnar.org, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / QoS: Create device constraints objects on notifier registration
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:33:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120428153335.GA13787@G62> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204272348.18533.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> 
> The current behavior of dev_pm_qos_add_notifier() makes device PM QoS
> notifiers less than useful.  Namely, it silently returns success when
> called before any PM QoS constraints are added for the device, so the
> caller will assume that the notifier has been registered, but when
> someone actually adds some nontrivial constraints for the device
> eventually, the previous callers of dev_pm_qos_add_notifier()
> will not know about that and their notifier routines will not be
> executed (contrary to their expectations).
> 
> To address this problem make dev_pm_qos_add_notifier() create the
> constraints object for the device if it is not present when the
> routine is called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/qos.c |   19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux/drivers/base/power/qos.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/base/power/qos.c
> +++ linux/drivers/base/power/qos.c
> @@ -352,21 +352,26 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_remove_requ
>   *
>   * Will register the notifier into a notification chain that gets called
>   * upon changes to the target value for the device.
> + *
> + * If the device's constraints object doesn't exist when this routine is called,
> + * it will be created (or error code will be returned if that fails).
>   */
>  int dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *notifier)
>  {
> -	int retval = 0;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
>  
> -	/* Silently return if the constraints object is not present. */
> -	if (dev->power.constraints)
> -		retval = blocking_notifier_chain_register(
> -				dev->power.constraints->notifiers,
> -				notifier);
FWIW (and IIRC) I did this because some audio use of pm_qos had a series
of re-allocation of constraints and clean up that would fall over so I
had this silent hack to deal with that "complexity".

> +	if (!dev->power.constraints)
> +		ret = dev->power.power_state.event != PM_EVENT_INVALID ?
> +			dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev) : -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!ret)
> +		ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(
> +				dev->power.constraints->notifiers, notifier);
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
> -	return retval;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_add_notifier);
>  
Definitely a change for the better (but we should check that the audio
stuff still works before committing this.  I'll see if I can check that
this weekend.)

Acked-by : markgross <markgross@thegnar.org>

--mark


  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-28 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-27 21:46 [PATCH 0/2] PM / QoS / Domains: Fix and optimization Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-27 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / QoS: Create device constraints objects on notifier registration Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-28 15:33   ` mark gross [this message]
2012-04-28 21:10     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-27 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/2][RFC] PM / Domains: Cache device stop and domain power off governor results Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-29  1:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] PM / QoS / Domains: Fixes and optimization, take 2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-29  1:11   ` [PATCH 1/3] PM / QoS: Create device constraints objects on notifier registration Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-30  8:57     ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-29  1:12   ` [PATCH 2/3] PM / Domains: Make device removal more straightforward Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-29  1:14   ` [PATCH 3/3][RFC] PM / Domains: Cache device stop and domain power off governor results, v2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-29 14:12     ` [Update][PATCH 3/3][RFC] PM / Domains: Cache device stop and domain power off governor results, v3 Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120428153335.GA13787@G62 \
    --to=markgross@thegnar.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.