From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric@eukrea.com (Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?=) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:32:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] pwm-core: fix compilation when OF is not selected In-Reply-To: <20120429170431.GA29827@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> References: <1335713330-6488-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <20120429170431.GA29827@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> Message-ID: <20120429193224.2cdc75e7@eb-e6520> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:04:31 +0200, Thierry Reding a ?crit : > * Eric B?nard wrote: > > else we get the following error : > > drivers/pwm/core.c: In function 'pwm_get': > > drivers/pwm/core.c:538:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_pwm_request' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric B?nard > > This is solved a little differently in the latest patches. That no longer has > the of_pwm_request() function protected by #ifdef CONFIG_OF, but rather calls > it in a IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)-protected block so that it will still receive > compile coverage in !OF configurations but at the same time will be removed > by the compiler's dead code elimination. > OK, this was based on de8eba0b1e53ee0d2e3270c12d6482971e2beb4b in your tree dated the 27th march. I now see you updated it on friday. Eric