From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move most arches to asm-generic/current.h Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:38:29 +0000 Message-ID: <201204301638.29398.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1335237509-17113-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <201204301415.56690.arnd@arndb.de> <4F9EBF3E.8060401@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:53449 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756192Ab2D3Qif (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:38:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F9EBF3E.8060401@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Monday 30 April 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote: > I admit I haven't compile tested this on all the affected architectures. > Looking at the architectures that are migrated here I don't see any that > are defining get_current() as a macro except for alpha. Should I drop > alpha from the patch? Or would it be easier if someone threw this into > linux-next and see if it blows up? > > In the meantime I can scrounge around for those kernel.org > cross-compilers and see if I can compile alpha. I'd say either get an Ack from the Alpha maintainers or drop that hunk from your patch. Arnd