[PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86 emulator: Move ModRM flags for groups to top level opcode tables

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
To: avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86 emulator: Move ModRM flags for groups to top level opcode tables
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:46:31 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120430174631.371b86aba2373acb05bc20cc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120430174341.8a8cc2b9f9b613fdc51b7daf@gmail.com>

From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>

Needed for the following patch which simplifies ModRM fetching code.

Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c |  111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 0d151e2..8d2c3d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -3359,8 +3359,8 @@ static int check_perm_out(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 		      .check_perm = (_p) }
 #define N    D(0)
 #define EXT(_f, _e) { .flags = ((_f) | RMExt), .u.group = (_e) }
-#define G(_f, _g) { .flags = ((_f) | Group), .u.group = (_g) }
-#define GD(_f, _g) { .flags = ((_f) | GroupDual), .u.gdual = (_g) }
+#define G(_f, _g) { .flags = ((_f) | Group | ModRM), .u.group = (_g) }
+#define GD(_f, _g) { .flags = ((_f) | GroupDual | ModRM), .u.gdual = (_g) }
 #define I(_f, _e) { .flags = (_f), .u.execute = (_e) }
 #define II(_f, _e, _i) \
 	{ .flags = (_f), .u.execute = (_e), .intercept = x86_intercept_##_i }
@@ -3380,25 +3380,25 @@ static int check_perm_out(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 		I2bv(((_f) & ~Lock) | DstAcc | SrcImm, _e)
 
 static struct opcode group7_rm1[] = {
-	DI(SrcNone | ModRM | Priv, monitor),
-	DI(SrcNone | ModRM | Priv, mwait),
+	DI(SrcNone | Priv, monitor),
+	DI(SrcNone | Priv, mwait),
 	N, N, N, N, N, N,
 };
 
 static struct opcode group7_rm3[] = {
-	DIP(SrcNone | ModRM | Prot | Priv, vmrun,   check_svme_pa),
-	II(SrcNone | ModRM | Prot | VendorSpecific, em_vmmcall, vmmcall),
-	DIP(SrcNone | ModRM | Prot | Priv, vmload,  check_svme_pa),
-	DIP(SrcNone | ModRM | Prot | Priv, vmsave,  check_svme_pa),
-	DIP(SrcNone | ModRM | Prot | Priv, stgi,    check_svme),
-	DIP(SrcNone | ModRM | Prot | Priv, clgi,    check_svme),
-	DIP(SrcNone | ModRM | Prot | Priv, skinit,  check_svme),
-	DIP(SrcNone | ModRM | Prot | Priv, invlpga, check_svme),
+	DIP(SrcNone | Prot | Priv,		vmrun,		check_svme_pa),
+	II(SrcNone  | Prot | VendorSpecific,	em_vmmcall,	vmmcall),
+	DIP(SrcNone | Prot | Priv,		vmload,		check_svme_pa),
+	DIP(SrcNone | Prot | Priv,		vmsave,		check_svme_pa),
+	DIP(SrcNone | Prot | Priv,		stgi,		check_svme),
+	DIP(SrcNone | Prot | Priv,		clgi,		check_svme),
+	DIP(SrcNone | Prot | Priv,		skinit,		check_svme),
+	DIP(SrcNone | Prot | Priv,		invlpga,	check_svme),
 };
 
 static struct opcode group7_rm7[] = {
 	N,
-	DIP(SrcNone | ModRM, rdtscp, check_rdtsc),
+	DIP(SrcNone, rdtscp, check_rdtsc),
 	N, N, N, N, N, N,
 };
 
@@ -3414,76 +3414,77 @@ static struct opcode group1[] = {
 };
 
 static struct opcode group1A[] = {
-	I(DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM | Mov | Stack, em_pop), N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
+	I(DstMem | SrcNone | Mov | Stack, em_pop), N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
 };
 
 static struct opcode group3[] = {
-	I(DstMem | SrcImm | ModRM, em_test),
-	I(DstMem | SrcImm | ModRM, em_test),
-	I(DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM | Lock, em_not),
-	I(DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM | Lock, em_neg),
-	I(SrcMem | ModRM, em_mul_ex),
-	I(SrcMem | ModRM, em_imul_ex),
-	I(SrcMem | ModRM, em_div_ex),
-	I(SrcMem | ModRM, em_idiv_ex),
+	I(DstMem | SrcImm, em_test),
+	I(DstMem | SrcImm, em_test),
+	I(DstMem | SrcNone | Lock, em_not),
+	I(DstMem | SrcNone | Lock, em_neg),
+	I(SrcMem, em_mul_ex),
+	I(SrcMem, em_imul_ex),
+	I(SrcMem, em_div_ex),
+	I(SrcMem, em_idiv_ex),
 };
 
 static struct opcode group4[] = {
-	I(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM | Lock, em_grp45),
-	I(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM | Lock, em_grp45),
+	I(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcNone | Lock, em_grp45),
+	I(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcNone | Lock, em_grp45),
 	N, N, N, N, N, N,
 };
 
 static struct opcode group5[] = {
-	I(DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM | Lock, em_grp45),
-	I(DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM | Lock, em_grp45),
-	I(SrcMem | ModRM | Stack, em_grp45),
-	I(SrcMemFAddr | ModRM | ImplicitOps | Stack, em_call_far),
-	I(SrcMem | ModRM | Stack, em_grp45),
-	I(SrcMemFAddr | ModRM | ImplicitOps, em_grp45),
-	I(SrcMem | ModRM | Stack, em_grp45), N,
+	I(DstMem | SrcNone | Lock,		em_grp45),
+	I(DstMem | SrcNone | Lock,		em_grp45),
+	I(SrcMem | Stack,			em_grp45),
+	I(SrcMemFAddr | ImplicitOps | Stack,	em_call_far),
+	I(SrcMem | Stack,			em_grp45),
+	I(SrcMemFAddr | ImplicitOps,		em_grp45),
+	I(SrcMem | Stack,			em_grp45), N,
 };
 
 static struct opcode group6[] = {
-	DI(ModRM | Prot,        sldt),
-	DI(ModRM | Prot,        str),
-	DI(ModRM | Prot | Priv, lldt),
-	DI(ModRM | Prot | Priv, ltr),
+	DI(Prot,	sldt),
+	DI(Prot,	str),
+	DI(Prot | Priv,	lldt),
+	DI(Prot | Priv,	ltr),
 	N, N, N, N,
 };
 
 static struct group_dual group7 = { {
-	DI(ModRM | Mov | DstMem | Priv, sgdt),
-	DI(ModRM | Mov | DstMem | Priv, sidt),
-	II(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv, em_lgdt, lgdt),
-	II(ModRM | SrcMem | Priv, em_lidt, lidt),
-	II(SrcNone | ModRM | DstMem | Mov, em_smsw, smsw), N,
-	II(SrcMem16 | ModRM | Mov | Priv, em_lmsw, lmsw),
-	II(SrcMem | ModRM | ByteOp | Priv | NoAccess, em_invlpg, invlpg),
+	DI(Mov | DstMem | Priv,			sgdt),
+	DI(Mov | DstMem | Priv,			sidt),
+	II(SrcMem | Priv,			em_lgdt, lgdt),
+	II(SrcMem | Priv,			em_lidt, lidt),
+	II(SrcNone | DstMem | Mov,		em_smsw, smsw), N,
+	II(SrcMem16 | Mov | Priv,		em_lmsw, lmsw),
+	II(SrcMem | ByteOp | Priv | NoAccess,	em_invlpg, invlpg),
 }, {
-	I(SrcNone | ModRM | Priv | VendorSpecific, em_vmcall),
+	I(SrcNone | Priv | VendorSpecific,	em_vmcall),
 	EXT(0, group7_rm1),
 	N, EXT(0, group7_rm3),
-	II(SrcNone | ModRM | DstMem | Mov, em_smsw, smsw), N,
-	II(SrcMem16 | ModRM | Mov | Priv, em_lmsw, lmsw), EXT(0, group7_rm7),
+	II(SrcNone | DstMem | Mov,		em_smsw, smsw), N,
+	II(SrcMem16 | Mov | Priv,		em_lmsw, lmsw),
+	EXT(0, group7_rm7),
 } };
 
 static struct opcode group8[] = {
 	N, N, N, N,
-	I(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM, em_bt),
-	I(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Lock | PageTable, em_bts),
-	I(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Lock, em_btr),
-	I(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Lock | PageTable, em_btc),
+	I(DstMem | SrcImmByte,				em_bt),
+	I(DstMem | SrcImmByte | Lock | PageTable,	em_bts),
+	I(DstMem | SrcImmByte | Lock,			em_btr),
+	I(DstMem | SrcImmByte | Lock | PageTable,	em_btc),
 };
 
 static struct group_dual group9 = { {
-	N, I(DstMem64 | ModRM | Lock | PageTable, em_cmpxchg8b), N, N, N, N, N, N,
+	N, I(DstMem64 | Lock | PageTable, em_cmpxchg8b), N, N, N, N, N, N,
 }, {
 	N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
 } };
 
 static struct opcode group11[] = {
-	I(DstMem | SrcImm | ModRM | Mov | PageTable, em_mov),
+	I(DstMem | SrcImm | Mov | PageTable, em_mov),
 	X7(D(Undefined)),
 };
 
@@ -3541,10 +3542,10 @@ static struct opcode opcode_table[256] = {
 	/* 0x70 - 0x7F */
 	X16(D(SrcImmByte)),
 	/* 0x80 - 0x87 */
-	G(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcImm | ModRM | Group, group1),
-	G(DstMem | SrcImm | ModRM | Group, group1),
-	G(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcImm | ModRM | No64 | Group, group1),
-	G(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Group, group1),
+	G(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcImm, group1),
+	G(DstMem | SrcImm, group1),
+	G(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcImm | No64, group1),
+	G(DstMem | SrcImmByte, group1),
 	I2bv(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM, em_test),
 	I2bv(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | Lock | PageTable, em_xchg),
 	/* 0x88 - 0x8F */
-- 
1.7.5.4

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-30  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-30  8:43 [PATCH 0/2 v2] KVM: x86 emulator: Simplify ModRM fetching Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-30  8:46 ` Takuya Yoshikawa [this message]
2012-04-30 10:31   ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86 emulator: Move ModRM flags for groups to top level opcode tables Avi Kivity
2012-04-30 14:20     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-30  8:48 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] KVM: x86 emulator: Avoid pushing back ModRM byte fetched for group decoding Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-30 10:33 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] KVM: x86 emulator: Simplify ModRM fetching Avi Kivity
2012-05-06 13:16 ` Avi Kivity

find likely ancestor, descendant, or conflicting patches for this message:
( dfblob:0d151e2 dfblob:8d2c3d0 )
 OR (
bs:"[PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86 emulator: Move ModRM flags for groups to top level opcode tables" )
	(help)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120430174631.371b86aba2373acb05bc20cc@gmail.com \
    --to=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.