From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm_para_available() should check hypervisor bit before accessing hypervisor cpuid leaf.
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 09:52:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120501065217.GB22191@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335803832.2574.0.camel@offbook>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 06:37:12PM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 14:45 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > This couid range does not exist on real HW and Intel spec says that
> > "Information returned for highest basic information leaf" will be
> > returned. Not very well defined.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> > index 99c4bbe..a7a7a94 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> > @@ -178,14 +178,16 @@ static inline int kvm_para_available(void)
> > unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> > char signature[13];
> >
> > - cpuid(KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> > - memcpy(signature + 0, &ebx, 4);
> > - memcpy(signature + 4, &ecx, 4);
> > - memcpy(signature + 8, &edx, 4);
> > - signature[12] = 0;
> > -
> > - if (strcmp(signature, "KVMKVMKVM") == 0)
> > - return 1;
> > + if (cpu_has_hypervisor) {
> > + cpuid(KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> > + memcpy(signature + 0, &ebx, 4);
> > + memcpy(signature + 4, &ecx, 4);
> > + memcpy(signature + 8, &edx, 4);
> > + signature[12] = 0;
> > +
> > + if (strcmp(signature, "KVMKVMKVM") == 0)
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Wouldn't this be better?
>
If I thought it would I would have wrote it like that :) I prefer less exit
points from a function if possible.
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> @@ -170,6 +170,9 @@ static inline int kvm_para_available(void)
> unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> char signature[13];
>
> + if (!cpu_has_hypervisor)
> + return 0;
> +
> cpuid(KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> memcpy(signature + 0, &ebx, 4);
> memcpy(signature + 4, &ecx, 4);
>
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-01 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-30 11:45 [PATCH] kvm_para_available() should check hypervisor bit before accessing hypervisor cpuid leaf Gleb Natapov
2012-04-30 16:37 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2012-05-01 6:52 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2012-05-01 12:50 ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-01 12:55 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-05-01 12:59 ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-02 12:09 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-05-06 12:55 ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-06 13:00 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120501065217.GB22191@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@gnu.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.