From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.1]:43753 "EHLO smtp1-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754197Ab2EAK13 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 06:27:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 12:28:30 +0200 From: Jean-Francois Moine To: Hans de Goede Cc: Hans Verkuil , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFCv1 PATCH 0/7] gspca: allow use of control framework and other fixes Message-ID: <20120501122830.2c4d4cbe@tele> In-Reply-To: <4F9E73F7.6040207@redhat.com> References: <1335625796-9429-1-git-send-email-hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <4F9E73F7.6040207@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:13:59 +0200 Hans de Goede wrote: > I'll review this and add these to my tree. Jean-Francois, is it ok for these changes > to go upstream through my tree? The reason I'm asking is that I plan to convert > more subdrivers to the control framework for 3.5 and its easiest to have this all > in one tree then. Hi Hans, As you know, I don't like them, but no matter, I am a bit tired about the webcams (4 years now) and I'd be glad to change for new applications (wayland, haiku, ARM?). Is anybody interested in maintaining the gspca stuff? Regards. -- Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/