All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] efi: Validate UEFI boot variables
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 15:54:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120502145412.GA20058@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335930906.8274.97.camel@deadeye>

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 04:55:06AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:

> This validation is crap; you're not accounting for the size of the node
> or invalid lengths.  Try:

Good catch.

> Isn't this slightly too restrictive?  The '& 0xff' results in many
> non-ASCII characters aliasing hex digits and potentially causes a
> variable to be validated as if it was special.  I would think the
> correct condition is:

Mm. Yeah, I guess that should probably be permitted.

> 		if (var->VariableName[i] > 127 ||
> 		    hex_to_bin(var->VariableName[i]) < 0)
> 
> Presumably the variable should also be ignored if there are any more
> characters after the 4 hex digits?

The spec doesn't permit any such names, so I don't think it makes any 
difference in practice. But in theory, we should probably either 
explicitly permit or reject them rather than treating them as if they're 
boot variables.

> > +	/* A valid entry must be at least 6 bytes */
> > +	if (len < 6)
> > +		return false;
> 
> Surely 8 bytes - otherwise you don't even have space for the
> description's null terminator.

Yes, I guess that could trip things up.

> > +	filepathlength = buffer[4] | buffer[5] << 8;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * There's no stored length for the description, so it has to be
> > +	 * found by hand
> > +	 */
> > +	desclength = utf16_strsize((efi_char16_t *)(buffer + 6), len) + 2;
> [...]
> 
> Second argument should be len - 6.

Sure.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-02 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-30 20:11 [PATCH 1/2] efi: Add new variable attributes Matthew Garrett
2012-04-30 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] efi: Validate UEFI boot variables Matthew Garrett
2012-05-01  0:00   ` Shea Levy
2012-05-01  0:31     ` Matthew Garrett
2012-05-02  3:55   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-05-02 14:54     ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2012-04-30 22:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] efi: Add new variable attributes Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-16 13:58 Matthew Garrett
2012-02-16 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] efi: Validate UEFI boot variables Matthew Garrett
2012-02-16 14:27   ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120502145412.GA20058@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.