From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPhvT-0002Gd-HF for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 00:21:35 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [108.48.117.33]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M3F00EJA1M7QTA0@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 17:11:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA9692010D; Wed, 02 May 2012 18:10:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 18:10:55 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20120502221055.GB4581@denix.org> References: <1335951932-6143-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> <1335951932-6143-4-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120502095150.GA3682@jama.jama.net> <788719CB-F74E-4219-85AC-82BE71D2068F@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120502182913.GA4658@jama.jama.net> <4FA1A48A.2040605@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <4FA1A48A.2040605@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [meta-oe/denzil][PATCH 4/6] gcc-4.5: Match with OE-Core on building procedure for libgcc and gcc-runtime X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 22:21:35 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:18:02PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/02/2012 11:29 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:26:49PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> > >> > >> Op 2 mei 2012 om 20:14 heeft Khem Raj het > >> volgende geschreven: > >> > >>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Martin Jansa > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I'm not using gcc-4.5, but aren't those 3 patches only for > >>>> master? As gcc-4.7 and other gcc changes were in oe-core only > >>>> after release AFAIK. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Yes they are strictly for master to accomodate basic changes in > >>> build sequence we did for gcc 4.7 that said, I think now that > >>> denzil has released we should reconsider maintaining gcc 4.5 in > >>> toolchain-layer and same goes for other recipes in the layer. > >>> Infact I feel the whole layer can be dropped. > >> > >> I was planning to propose the same, any objections? > > > > I've switched to gcc-4.7, so not from me. > > good and as Koen is nodding I assume angstrom is fine too. So I think > we should drop the layer from master. Yes, but not immediately - give one or two week notice, please :) Actually, this should be considered as a notice and the actual commit to remove should be executed later, if nobody says otherwise... Basically, sending an RFC patch for review that deletes gcc-4.5 and waiting few days should do it. -- Denys