All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: lower metadata writeback threshold on low dirty threshold
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 22:08:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120503140827.GA24981@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120503034311.GA14081@localhost>

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:43:11AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> This helps write performance when setting the dirty threshold to tiny numbers.
> 
>      3.4.0-rc2         3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
>   ------------  ------------------------
>          96.92        -0.4%        96.54  bay/thresh=1000M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>          98.47        +0.0%        98.50  bay/thresh=1000M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>          99.38        -0.3%        99.06  bay/thresh=1000M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>          98.04        -0.0%        98.02  bay/thresh=100M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>          98.68        +0.3%        98.98  bay/thresh=100M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>          99.34        -0.0%        99.31  bay/thresh=100M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>   ==>    88.98        +9.6%        97.53  bay/thresh=10M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>   ==>    86.99       +13.1%        98.39  bay/thresh=10M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>   ==>     2.75     +2442.4%        69.88  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>   ==>     3.31     +2634.1%        90.54  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.4.0-rc2

Well, further tests show that it behaves very unstable:

       3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+         3.4.0-rc2-btrfs5+  
------------------------  ------------------------  
                   69.88       +16.4%        81.31  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
                   71.09        +1.4%        72.05  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-10dd-2-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
                   72.60        -1.7%        71.38  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-10dd-3-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
                   90.54        -0.9%        89.74  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
                   89.17       -90.2%     ==> 8.71  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-1dd-2-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
               ==> 14.96      +495.3%        89.06  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-1dd-3-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
                  408.23        +1.0%       412.26  TOTAL write_bw

Where the -btrfs5 kernel has one more patch to remove the write plug.

Thanks,
Fengguang

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-03 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-08  1:06 [RESEND][PATCH v2] block: remove plugging at buffered write time Wu Fengguang
2012-04-09 14:34 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-04-11 23:13   ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-12  1:32     ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-12  2:20       ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-12 14:26         ` Jan Kara
2012-04-13  1:40           ` Fengguang Wu
2012-05-03  3:43             ` [PATCH] btrfs: lower metadata writeback threshold on low dirty threshold Fengguang Wu
2012-05-03  3:53               ` [PATCH] writeback: initialize global_dirty_limit Fengguang Wu
2012-05-03  9:25               ` [PATCH] btrfs: lower metadata writeback threshold on low dirty threshold Jan Kara
2012-05-03 10:02                 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-05-03 12:31                 ` Chris Mason
2012-05-03 13:30                 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-03 14:08               ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-05-06  6:01           ` [RESEND][PATCH v2] block: remove plugging at buffered write time Fengguang Wu
2012-05-06  9:58       ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120503140827.GA24981@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@fusionio.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.