From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] RFC: Solved unnecessary schedule latency in the TTY layer (3/3)
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 09:24:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120503162432.GA3063@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336048663-21882-3-git-send-email-meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:37:43PM +0200, Ivo Sieben wrote:
> Solved unnecessary schedule latency in the TTY layer when used in
> realtime context:
> The global wait_queue that is used for line discipline idle handling is
> moved to a separate wait_queue for each line instance. This prevents
> unnecessary blocking on one line, because of idle handling on another
> line.
This patch makes sense even in a non-RT case, as it localizes the lock
to the specific ldisc.
Alan, any objection to me applying this one to the tree now?
thanks,
greg k-h
> Note: In a PREEMPT_RT system "normal" spin locks behave like mutexes and
> no interrupts (and therefor no scheduling) is disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 7 ++++---
> include/linux/tty_ldisc.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
> index 30836cc..77eb299 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
>
> static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(tty_ldisc_lock);
> static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(tty_ldisc_wait);
> -static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(tty_ldisc_idle);
> /* Line disc dispatch table */
> static struct tty_ldisc_ops *tty_ldiscs[NR_LDISCS];
>
> @@ -65,7 +64,7 @@ static void put_ldisc(struct tty_ldisc *ld)
> return;
> }
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
> - wake_up(&tty_ldisc_idle);
> + wake_up(&ld->wq_idle);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -200,6 +199,8 @@ static struct tty_ldisc *tty_ldisc_get(int disc)
>
> ld->ops = ldops;
> atomic_set(&ld->users, 1);
> + init_waitqueue_head(&ld->wq_idle);
> +
> return ld;
> }
>
> @@ -538,7 +539,7 @@ static void tty_ldisc_flush_works(struct tty_struct *tty)
> static int tty_ldisc_wait_idle(struct tty_struct *tty, long timeout)
> {
> long ret;
> - ret = wait_event_timeout(tty_ldisc_idle,
> + ret = wait_event_timeout(tty->ldisc->wq_idle,
> atomic_read(&tty->ldisc->users) == 1, timeout);
> return ret > 0 ? 0 : -EBUSY;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h b/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h
> index ff7dc08..fb79dd8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tty_ldisc.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/wait.h>
> #include <linux/pps_kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
>
> struct tty_ldisc_ops {
> int magic;
> @@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ struct tty_ldisc_ops {
> struct tty_ldisc {
> struct tty_ldisc_ops *ops;
> atomic_t users;
> + wait_queue_head_t wq_idle;
> };
>
> #define TTY_LDISC_MAGIC 0x5403
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-03 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-03 12:37 [PATCH 1/3] RFC: Solved unnecessary schedule latency in the TTY layer (1/3) Ivo Sieben
2012-05-03 12:37 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-05-03 12:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] RFC: Solved unnecessary schedule latency in the TTY layer (2/3) Ivo Sieben
2012-05-03 12:37 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-05-03 16:25 ` Greg KH
2012-05-07 7:45 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-05-03 12:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] RFC: Solved unnecessary schedule latency in the TTY layer (3/3) Ivo Sieben
2012-05-03 12:37 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-05-03 16:24 ` Greg KH [this message]
2012-05-10 15:28 ` Alan Cox
2012-05-10 15:28 ` Alan Cox
2012-05-07 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] RFC: Solved unnecessary schedule latency in the TTY layer (1/3) Ivo Sieben
2012-05-10 15:26 ` Alan Cox
2012-05-10 15:26 ` Alan Cox
2012-05-14 12:25 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-05-15 15:04 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120503162432.GA3063@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meltedpianoman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.