From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: tegra: Add Tegra Memory Controller(MC) driver Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 08:41:38 +0000 Message-ID: <201205040841.39351.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1336063897-12083-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <20120504083424.0f394a6db8e95763e59ae2a0@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120504083424.0f394a6db8e95763e59ae2a0@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hiroshi Doyu Cc: Stephen Warren , Russell King , Olof Johansson , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Colin Cross , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Friday 04 May 2012, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > Since tegra has a custom memory controller it's not as obvious that it > > needs to go in a shared location, indeed. But it's easier to use the > > same practices across platforms, and if there are other vendors that > > end up sharing IP blocks for memory down the road, having them in a > > common location makes sense. > > I think that the above TI's patch is: > > Add TI EMIF SDRAM controller driver > http://lwn.net/Articles/494922/ > > I'm moving this Tegra MC driver under drivers/memory, "tegra{20,30}-mc.c". Ok, very good! Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 08:41:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: tegra: Add Tegra Memory Controller(MC) driver In-Reply-To: <20120504083424.0f394a6db8e95763e59ae2a0@nvidia.com> References: <1336063897-12083-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <20120504083424.0f394a6db8e95763e59ae2a0@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <201205040841.39351.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 04 May 2012, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > Since tegra has a custom memory controller it's not as obvious that it > > needs to go in a shared location, indeed. But it's easier to use the > > same practices across platforms, and if there are other vendors that > > end up sharing IP blocks for memory down the road, having them in a > > common location makes sense. > > I think that the above TI's patch is: > > Add TI EMIF SDRAM controller driver > http://lwn.net/Articles/494922/ > > I'm moving this Tegra MC driver under drivers/memory, "tegra{20,30}-mc.c". Ok, very good! Arnd