From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759708Ab2EDV3b (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2012 17:29:31 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33790 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756436Ab2EDV33 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2012 17:29:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 14:29:26 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Alex Shi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cl@gentwo.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, avi@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, kaber@trash.net, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, ying.huang@intel.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com, jeremy@goop.org Subject: Re: [PATH v2 0/5] Code clean up for percpu_xxx serial functions Message-Id: <20120504142926.a930ba90.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1326470018-22342-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> References: <1326470018-22342-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:53:33 +0800 Alex Shi wrote: > I am sorry for spelling mistaken on konrad's email address, so resend > for correct this. Please reply this resend email. > > --------------- > Thanks for TJ's suggestion, I split the serial patch smaller for > potential bisection convenience. > > Compare to v1 patch, this v2 patches has separate function replace > patches and final dead code clean up patch. > > The net, xen and x86 part code are independent. > > After each part was accepted in kernel, the final(5th) clean up code > do the real clean up in next merge window. I will refresh the patch > at that time. > > Any further comments are appreciated! > I'm still sitting on these patches. The review was a bit inconclusive and confusing and everyone will have forgotten all about everything. I think I'll drop them and ask for a resend, please. Be sure to update the changelogs so that they address everything which was discussed last time - so we don't end up covering the same ground. Please also Cc everyone who was involved in the discussion last time.