From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pascal Chapperon <pascal.chapperon@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: RCU related performance regression in 3.3
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 08:04:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120504150411.GC2411@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA3EAEE.9030601@wanadoo.fr>
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 04:42:54PM +0200, Pascal Chapperon wrote:
> Le 01/05/2012 17:45, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
>
> >Here is my RCU_FAST_NO_HZ patch stack on top of v3.4-rc4.
> >
> >Or you can pull branch fnh.2012.05.01a from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> I applied your global patch on top of v3.4-rc4. But the slowdown is
> worse than before : boot sequence took 80s instead 20-30s (12s for
> initramfs instead of 2s).
>
> I'll send you rcu tracing log in a second mail.
Hmmm... Well, I guess I am glad that I finally did something that
had an effect, but I sure wish that the effect had been in the other
direction!
Just to make sure I understand: the difference between the 20-30s and
the 80s is exactly the patch I sent you?
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-04 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-27 12:15 RCU related performance regression in 3.3 Pascal Chapperon
2012-04-28 3:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-01 0:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-01 8:55 ` Pascal Chapperon
2012-05-01 15:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-04 14:42 ` Pascal Chapperon
2012-05-04 15:04 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-05-04 21:41 ` Pascal Chapperon
2012-05-04 23:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-10 8:40 ` Pascal Chapperon
2012-05-14 22:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-18 11:01 ` Pascal Chapperon
2012-05-18 12:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-18 14:48 ` Pascal Chapperon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-04 15:27 Josh Boyer
2012-04-04 21:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-05 12:37 ` Josh Boyer
2012-04-05 14:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-05 14:15 ` Pascal CHAPPERON
2012-04-05 14:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-06 9:18 ` Pascal Chapperon
2012-04-10 16:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-11 15:06 ` Pascal
2012-04-12 18:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-16 21:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-18 9:37 ` Pascal Chapperon
2012-04-18 14:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-18 15:00 ` Pascal Chapperon
2012-04-18 15:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-20 14:45 ` Pascal Chapperon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120504150411.GC2411@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pascal.chapperon@wanadoo.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.