From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 19:21:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 - first shot Message-Id: <201205051921.13209.arnd@arndb.de> List-Id: References: <20120503144645.6390.62303.sendpatchset@w520> <201205050722.45500.arnd@arndb.de> <201205052108.03001.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <201205052108.03001.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Saturday 05 May 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Now, if you insist on us having a separate mach- directory for every platform > (SoC), we can do that I think, but then we should start with splitting up the > existing mach-shmobile into a number of SoC-specific directories rather than > adding new mach- directories for random new parts, because that goes against > our development history to date, which is important too IMHO. All the chips in there so far share a common ancestry and they all use a significant subset of the same drivers shared with arch/sh: i2c-sh_mobile, sh-dma-engine, sh_cmt, sh-sci, sh_tmu, intc, pfc and sh_clk. AFAICT, this one uses none of those and apparently was developed by NEC before the merger with Renesas. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 19:21:12 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 00/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 - first shot In-Reply-To: <201205052108.03001.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20120503144645.6390.62303.sendpatchset@w520> <201205050722.45500.arnd@arndb.de> <201205052108.03001.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: <201205051921.13209.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Saturday 05 May 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Now, if you insist on us having a separate mach- directory for every platform > (SoC), we can do that I think, but then we should start with splitting up the > existing mach-shmobile into a number of SoC-specific directories rather than > adding new mach- directories for random new parts, because that goes against > our development history to date, which is important too IMHO. All the chips in there so far share a common ancestry and they all use a significant subset of the same drivers shared with arch/sh: i2c-sh_mobile, sh-dma-engine, sh_cmt, sh-sci, sh_tmu, intc, pfc and sh_clk. AFAICT, this one uses none of those and apparently was developed by NEC before the merger with Renesas. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755427Ab2EETVW (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2012 15:21:22 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:63249 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752046Ab2EETVU (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2012 15:21:20 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 - first shot Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 19:21:12 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.4.0-rc3; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Magnus Damm , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, horms@verge.net.au, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, olof@lixom.net References: <20120503144645.6390.62303.sendpatchset@w520> <201205050722.45500.arnd@arndb.de> <201205052108.03001.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <201205052108.03001.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205051921.13209.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:+3+tKZtCYKJHJZoE9mBUL2CSInM9erhRO8WdMwajfwR MaUFuN3p10MzQp8YG093rD9g7NthrCNY5X0FBmBKT4eKcmoHwF oaWzwFXCdQOUij9d+FDob5WE5sgsOV891yqPhjyEe4lCdnwXjC oHU+n0W4DblP9qrF1M1NaU9oOvbqRjdGwZVhSK70LWxUwjG+9c mDtjQG6flDSn03eJRf+b6zMpTatBfrJl1gYv7lbcv4m4gIJOCa P4lZ2pjCzjTInvAiJ8APv0sHKprl8VRLYqidJGDyBOcq/1Ngnf qlMtbqEA6zfGGqDNF14Q6FhuFa+5hzH8fP5GPfIRS/lDwN33AZ mseGx4N0BYVQ6Bn62G28= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 05 May 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Now, if you insist on us having a separate mach- directory for every platform > (SoC), we can do that I think, but then we should start with splitting up the > existing mach-shmobile into a number of SoC-specific directories rather than > adding new mach- directories for random new parts, because that goes against > our development history to date, which is important too IMHO. All the chips in there so far share a common ancestry and they all use a significant subset of the same drivers shared with arch/sh: i2c-sh_mobile, sh-dma-engine, sh_cmt, sh-sci, sh_tmu, intc, pfc and sh_clk. AFAICT, this one uses none of those and apparently was developed by NEC before the merger with Renesas. Arnd