From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] perf ui/gtk: Use struct perf_error_ops
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:40:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120507084015.GL16608@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zk9kqtwh.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
* Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 7 May 2012 10:10:51 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:31:28 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> >> Define and use perf_gtk_eops to provide a GTK2 message
> >> >> dialog for error reporting. To do that, we need global
> >> >> main_window variable for tracking UI state.
> >> >>
> >> > I think this is an usability glitch waiting to happen - especially so if
> >> > you use it for warnings. There's no reason to require the user to react to
> >> > warning messages in the GUI because there's absolutely nothing they can do
> >> > about them.
> >> >
> >> > I guess we could do something like the "ui helpline" thing used by the
> >> > newt front-end if we really wanted to.
> >> >
> >> > Pekka
> >>
> >> I did quick grep on ui__warning and found that most of its
> >> users are trying to show the messages before exiting. I think
> >> some (at least) of them can be converted to ui__error(). And
> >> as existing implementation (TUI) already requires user input
> >> for this, I thought it's ok.
> >>
> >> But I agreed with you that ui__warning should not be used for
> >> showing non-critical messages and converted to helpline-style
> >> ones.
> >
> > If they are in essence ui__error() already then please convert
> > them to ui__error() instead of perpetuating the mistake - don't
> > force annoying pop-ups for warnings that may or may not be
> > fatal. Spurious pop-ups are sad and people hate them.
> >
>
> Ok, will do that in another patch (series). So you mean
> ui__warning should not be a pop-up dialog, right?
Pekka, is that what you meant too?
If there are *real* warnings that are not followed up by some
fatal close of the application then those should probably be
displayed in some sort of unintrusive manner - a scrolling list
of events, a small status display box that can be clicked on if
people get curious, etc.
Small, well-thought out details like that are nice in a GUI.
Create enough of them and people start not to hate the app
(people generally hate computers, so GUIs have an uphill
struggle). Break a critical mass and people will actively love
the app.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-30 4:55 [PATCH 0/7] perf ui: Add basic error handling for GTK2 front-end Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf ui: Make setup_browser() generic Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 6:33 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf ui: Drop arg[cv] arguments from perf_gtk_setup_browser() Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 6:34 ` [tip:perf/core] perf ui gtk: " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf ui/gtk: Rename functions for consistency Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 6:35 ` [tip:perf/core] perf ui gtk: " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf ui: Add gtk2 support into setup_browser() Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 6:36 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf ui: Change fallback policy of setup_browser() Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 6:37 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf ui: Introduce struct perf_error_ops Namhyung Kim
2012-05-02 19:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-03 14:35 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf ui/gtk: Use " Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 6:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-04-30 8:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-07 8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-07 8:26 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-07 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-29 4:22 [PATCH 0/7] perf ui: Add basic error handling for GTK2 front-end (v3) Namhyung Kim
2012-05-29 4:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf ui/gtk: Use struct perf_error_ops Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120507084015.GL16608@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.