From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dieter Bloms Subject: Re: sched params spurious error message (Was: Re: 4.2 TODO / Release Status) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 12:56:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20120508105612.GA1341@bloms.de> References: <1336469655.14542.21.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1336473938.14542.55.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1336473938.14542.55.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Dario Faggioli , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi, On Tue, May 08, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 10:34 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > * xl compatibility with xm: > > [...] > > * [BUG] does not honour scheduler weight params, reported > > by Dieter Bloms in <20120423193518.GA16134@bloms.de>, > > Dieter's patch has been accepted. (DONE, However see > > next bug...) > > * [BUG] Spurious CPU params error message when starting a > > domain, e.g. "Cpu weight out of range, valid values are > > within range from 1 to 65535". This is an issue with > > Dieter Bloms' patch to honour scheduler params. > > Is anyone looking into this? I've made a little patch to set this value to 256 when it wasn't defined in the configfile, but George Dunlap didn't like it (rightly). I'm sorry, my skill is not enough to implement a reasonable solution for this issue :( Maybe we should revert my patch as long as there isn't a fix. -- Best regards Dieter -- I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software. If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the >>From field.